25.07.2014 Views

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The incentives <strong>of</strong> the commons ceased to suffice as a management<br />

framework for marine fishery resources during the 1960's. The laws <strong>of</strong> demand<br />

and supply went awry. Demand rose; supply <strong>of</strong> the more valuable species<br />

declined as fishing effort increased. Measures taken to solve the resulting<br />

overfishing problem have failed to remove the root cause, the incentives <strong>of</strong><br />

harvester rights inherent in a commons. The resulting management system<br />

creates ill will and friction that severely impedes management <strong>of</strong> the<br />

resources. The efficacy <strong>of</strong> a management framework based on ownership <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ocean pastures is compared to one based on rights to harvest. The conclusion<br />

is reached that a full owner framework provides a well tested basis for<br />

management <strong>of</strong> marine fishery resources that can result in a large increase in<br />

resource benefits.<br />

Keiser, Richard K., Jr. (1976). "Species Composition, Magnitude and<br />

Utilization <strong>of</strong> the Incidental Catch <strong>of</strong> the South Carolina Shrimp<br />

Fishery." South Carolina Marine Resource Center, Technical Report<br />

Number 16, September, 1976.<br />

The quantity <strong>of</strong> fish caught incidental to shrimping activities in South<br />

Carolina was estimated by determining fish/whole shrimp ratios from commercial<br />

catches. The overall median fish/shrimp weight ratio was 1.94:1; however, the<br />

median ratio varied seasonally being smaller from September to December<br />

(1.24:1) than from May to August (3.58:1). The confidence interval for this<br />

estimate was defined by the 25 th and 75 th percentiles. An estimated fish catch<br />

<strong>of</strong> between 3,358,000 and 15,197,000 kgs was derived from expansion <strong>of</strong> detailed<br />

ratio estimates derived from this study. Sciaenids were the predominant<br />

family during the study except for the months <strong>of</strong> January and April when<br />

clupeids and gadids, respectively, comprised the greatest percentage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

catch. In general, fish caught incidental to shrimping were small; mean total<br />

lengths <strong>of</strong> 25 species ranged from 6.90 to 18.58 cm. At the present time, only<br />

a fraction <strong>of</strong> the total incidental catch is landed; the majority is discarded<br />

at sea. This apparently reflects a lack <strong>of</strong> demand for most species captured.<br />

It is estimated that 74% <strong>of</strong> the flounder catch is landed and sold as food fish<br />

compared to less than 2% <strong>of</strong> the sciaenids and scombrids.<br />

Keiser, Richard K., Jr. (1977). "The Incidental Catch from Commercial<br />

Shrimp Trawlers <strong>of</strong> the South Atlantic States." South Carolina<br />

Marine Resources Center, Technical Report Number 26, October, 38<br />

pp.<br />

Fish:shrimp (heads-on) ratios ranged from a low <strong>of</strong> 1.2:1 to a high <strong>of</strong><br />

4.0:1. Expansion <strong>of</strong> ratios indicated that an average <strong>of</strong> 69.4 million pounds<br />

<strong>of</strong> fish were caught by shrimp trawlers each year from 1973 to 1975. This was<br />

more than 24 times the 2.9 million pounds reportedly landed each year.<br />

Flounders and edible size kingfish, spot, and croaker were the predominant<br />

species landed, while industrial size fish (primarily small sciaenids) were<br />

discarded.<br />

Keithly, Walter R. (198?). "An Analysis <strong>of</strong> Foreign Competition and<br />

Implications for the U.S. Shrimp Industry." Draft report, Coastal<br />

Fisheries Institute, Center for Wetland Resources, Louisiana State<br />

University, Baton Rouge, LA.<br />

Imports represent a large and growing component <strong>of</strong> the total U.S. shrimp<br />

supply. Industry, concerned with their trend, has in the past attempted to<br />

control imports. Before national policy can be made, policy makers must have<br />

an understanding <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> imports in the U.S. market. The purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

this study was to provide an understanding <strong>of</strong> the U.S. shrimp industry, the<br />

underlying factors responsible for the recent rise in imports, the role <strong>of</strong><br />

3 4 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!