25.07.2014 Views

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

considerations compounds the complications <strong>of</strong> scale. The challenge for<br />

management will be to overcome the complication <strong>of</strong> scale by recognition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

implications <strong>of</strong> a mixture <strong>of</strong> scales.<br />

Stevens, Robert E. (1984). "Recommendations for Action: Panel 5<br />

Development and the Management Process." Chapter 24 in Richard H.<br />

Stroud (ed.) Marine Recreational Fisheries, 9, Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Ninth Annual Marine Recreational Fisheries Symposium, Virginia<br />

Beach, Virginia, April 24 and 25, National Coalition for Marine<br />

Conservation, Inc., Savannah, Georgia.<br />

A summary <strong>of</strong> the discussion on development and the management process.<br />

Recommendations are made that will improve the chances for marine recreational<br />

<strong>fisheries</strong> development.<br />

Stollery, Kenneth (1986). "A Short-Run Model <strong>of</strong> Capital Stuffing in the<br />

Pacific Halibut Fishery." Marine Resource Economics, 3(2):137-<br />

153.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the predicted effects <strong>of</strong> regulation to curtail overfishing is<br />

"capital stuffing" where boats are overcapitalized to take maximum advantage<br />

<strong>of</strong> limited entry licensing or restrictions <strong>of</strong> the fishing season. The present<br />

paper utilizes a short run competitive fishery model to assess the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

quotas and season restrictions in the Pacific halibut fishery. The results in<br />

this case show labor productivity (a proxy for capital intensity) to be less<br />

strongly related to the length <strong>of</strong> the fishing season than to the halibut<br />

price, implying that the main effect <strong>of</strong> the quota may be an indirect one,<br />

through restricting supply and raising the price.<br />

Stollery, Kenneth (1986). "Monopsony Processing in an Open-Access<br />

Fishery." Marine Resource Economics, 3(4):331-351.<br />

In a recent paper, Clark and Munro (1980) showed that monopsony<br />

processing more than <strong>of</strong>fsets the effects <strong>of</strong> open access in the harvesting<br />

sector <strong>of</strong> a commercial fishery, and leads to over conservation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

resource. We show here that this conclusion depends critically on the cost <strong>of</strong><br />

capacity and consequent ease <strong>of</strong> entry and exit from the harvesting sector. In<br />

particular, for low entry and exit speeds the monopsonist has a high degree <strong>of</strong><br />

monopoly power and by depressing the price over conserves the natural resource<br />

relative to the social optimum, while as the adjustment speed approaches<br />

infinity a monopsonist employing a discount rate equal to the social rate <strong>of</strong><br />

discount will be induced to behave optimally from the viewpoint <strong>of</strong> society.<br />

By means <strong>of</strong> a simulation employing parameters from the Pacific halibut<br />

fishery, we also show that a monopsonist subject to relatively sluggish entry<br />

or exit may reap pr<strong>of</strong>its considerably less than the resource rents accruing if<br />

the resource were optimally managed.<br />

Stollery, Kenneth (1988). "Cooperatives as an Alternative to Regulation<br />

in Commercial Fisheries." Marine Resource Economics, 4:289-304.<br />

the problem <strong>of</strong> <strong>fisheries</strong> regulation is essentially one <strong>of</strong> assigning<br />

property rights to a scarce resource. This paper investigates the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

the establishment <strong>of</strong> a fishery cooperative as an alternative to limited entry<br />

licensing <strong>of</strong> a fishery, in effect transferring the property rights to the<br />

managers <strong>of</strong> the cooperative. The consequences <strong>of</strong> this for resource<br />

conservation are found to depend on the cooperative management policy. While<br />

a cooperative that is passive with respect to entry will behave in a manner<br />

identical to that <strong>of</strong> a competitive fishery, a cooperative that limits entry to<br />

maximize the existing members' share tends to over conserve the resource<br />

6 4 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!