25.07.2014 Views

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The management strategies in these two areas are the same. Area closures have<br />

been implemented in the Gulf <strong>of</strong> Mexico and are being considered in the south<br />

Atlantic region. The motivation for these closures is, however, different for<br />

the Gulf and south Atlantic regions. The purpose <strong>of</strong> the closure in the Gulf<br />

is to increase total revenue to the fishery on an annual basis. The closure<br />

in the south Atlantic is being developed to provide better recruitment to the<br />

fishery in years when environmental conditions are expected to severely reduce<br />

recruitment the following year.<br />

P<strong>of</strong>fenberger, John R. (1996). Comments on Shrimp Amendment 9 Regulatory<br />

Impact Review. Letter to Brad Brown, Director, National Marine<br />

Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Center, Miami, FL.<br />

Comments on the regulatory impact review <strong>of</strong> proposed bycatch reduction<br />

management regulations contain in shrimp amendment 9.<br />

Poggie, John J., Jr., Robert B. Pollnac, and C. Van Dusen (1996).<br />

"Intracultural Variability in the Cognition <strong>of</strong> Danger Among<br />

Southern New England Fishers." Marine Resource Economics,<br />

11(1):23-30.<br />

The costs <strong>of</strong> the dangers <strong>of</strong> commercial fishing are very high, yet<br />

fishing vessel safety regulations are frequently met with lack <strong>of</strong> enthusiasm<br />

or even rejection by <strong>fisheries</strong>. Why would fishers reject regulations designed<br />

to increase their safety? There is a strong possibility that some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

rejection is the result <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> cognitive sharing and communication between<br />

originators <strong>of</strong> the regulations and the fishers for whom the regulations are<br />

designed. This paper examines the pattern <strong>of</strong> cognition about danger <strong>of</strong> the<br />

occupation among fishers and relates these patterns to sociocultural<br />

differences in two southern New England ports. The intent <strong>of</strong> the study is to<br />

help bridge the gap between regulators and users by providing culturally<br />

appropriate information that can be used to design more effective policy,<br />

training , and enforcement programs.<br />

Poggie, John J., Jr., Robert B. Pollnac, and Miguel Fierro (1988).<br />

"Factors Influencing the Success <strong>of</strong> Fishermen's Cooperatives in<br />

Ecuador." Marine Resource Economics, 5(3):231-242.<br />

The fishermen's cooperative is viewed by many as the ideal type <strong>of</strong><br />

organization for use in improving the welfare <strong>of</strong> fishermen in development<br />

projects (cf. Meynell, 1984; Jent<strong>of</strong>t, 1986). Major development agencies such<br />

as the Food and Agriculture Organization <strong>of</strong> the United Nations and the World<br />

Bank also advocate their use. For example, a review <strong>of</strong> World Bank fishery<br />

projects between 1976 and 1981 indicated that 53% involved fishermen's<br />

cooperatives (Pollnac, 1985). Judging from the relatively high failure rate<br />

that appears to exist for this type <strong>of</strong> organization, however, it is clear that<br />

their development is a difficult matter.<br />

The success <strong>of</strong> fishermen's cooperatives depends on a large number <strong>of</strong><br />

factors as evidenced by the numerous variables identified in the <strong>literature</strong><br />

for local organizations in general (Esman and Uph<strong>of</strong>f, 1984) and fishermen's<br />

organizations in particular (Poggie, 1980a; Meynell, 1984; Pollnac, 1988).<br />

Pollnac (1985) identified no fewer than 21 important determinants <strong>of</strong> success<br />

for fishermen's organizations, some <strong>of</strong> which are clusters <strong>of</strong> variables. It<br />

appears, however, that there may be several important dimensions that underlie<br />

the reported concomitants <strong>of</strong> the success and failure <strong>of</strong> fishermen's<br />

organizations. As a means <strong>of</strong> furthering our understanding <strong>of</strong> these basic<br />

dimensions, this study analyzes a number <strong>of</strong> items reported in the <strong>literature</strong><br />

to be associated with the success and failure <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> organization.<br />

5 3 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!