25.07.2014 Views

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hannesson, Rognvaldur (1985). "Inefficiency Through Government<br />

Regulations: The Case <strong>of</strong> Norway s Fishery Policy." Marine<br />

Resource Economics, 2(2):115-141.<br />

The fishery is a classic example <strong>of</strong> market failure. Government<br />

intervention does not necessarily correct this, but may instead seek<br />

economically inefficient solutions, because <strong>of</strong> either a deliberate trade <strong>of</strong>f<br />

between efficiency and equity or political expediency. Norway s fishery<br />

policy is seen as a case in point. Its stated objectives put a low priority<br />

on economic efficiency, while various objectives based on equity are put in<br />

the foreground. The result is that the contribution <strong>of</strong> Norway s <strong>fisheries</strong> to<br />

the national income is slight. Norway s fishery policy consists <strong>of</strong> two<br />

largely uncoordinated parts, one concerned with maintaining fishermen s<br />

incomes and the other with managing fish stocks.<br />

Since the introduction <strong>of</strong> the 200 mile limit, most fish stocks exploited<br />

by Norway have been managed by total allowable catches (TACs). While this has<br />

prevented the depletion <strong>of</strong> fish stocks, the regulations introduced to enforce<br />

the TACs have been an economic failure. The setting <strong>of</strong> TACs has in some cases<br />

revealed a willingness to attain solutions expedient in the short term at the<br />

expense <strong>of</strong> long term benefits.<br />

Hannesson, Rognvaldur (1986). "The Effect <strong>of</strong> the Discount Rate on the<br />

Optimal Exploitation <strong>of</strong> Renewable Resources." Marine Resource<br />

Economics, 3(4):319-329.<br />

In a recent paper, Farzin (1984) has shown that the impact <strong>of</strong> the<br />

discount rate on the optimal rate <strong>of</strong> depletion <strong>of</strong> an exhaustible resource is<br />

ambiguous. Since Clark s (1973) paper on the extinction <strong>of</strong> animal species, it<br />

has been recognized that a higher discount rate increases the optimal rate <strong>of</strong><br />

exploitation and increases the likelihood <strong>of</strong> extinction, but ignores the<br />

capital cost implication <strong>of</strong> a higher discount rate; the effect discussed by<br />

Farzin. In this paper, the effect <strong>of</strong> the discount rate on the optimal rate <strong>of</strong><br />

exploitation and standing stock <strong>of</strong> a renewable resource such as fish is<br />

examined. This effect is ambiguous with the ambiguity depending on the dual<br />

role <strong>of</strong> the discount rate. On the one hand, the discount rate expresses a<br />

required rate <strong>of</strong> return on a growing asset. For a renewable resource with a<br />

concave growth function, a higher rate <strong>of</strong> discount implies a smaller standing<br />

stock. Ont the other hand, the discount rate expresses the opportunity cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> capital to be invested in harvesting equipment. A higher discount rate<br />

thus means more costly harvesting, which in turn implies a less intensive<br />

optimal harvesting and a larger standing stock.<br />

Hannesson, Rognvaldur (1987). "Optimal Catch Capacity and Fishing<br />

Effort in Deterministic and Stochastic Fishery Models." Fisheries<br />

Research, 5:1-21.<br />

This paper is a survey <strong>of</strong> <strong>fisheries</strong> <strong>economics</strong> aimed mainly at <strong>fisheries</strong><br />

biologists. The paper begins by reviewing the static theory, which<br />

established two major results. (I) Free access leads to over-exploitation, and<br />

(ii) the optimal rate <strong>of</strong> exploitation is less than the maximum sustainable<br />

yield. The latter could be regarded as an antithesis to the biological<br />

doctrine that fish stocks should be managed to give maximum sustainable yield<br />

(MSY).<br />

Dynamic theory, which is considered next, showed that the optimal rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> exploitation could be either less or greater than the MSY rate. In<br />

particular, a higher discount rate was shown to imply a higher rate <strong>of</strong><br />

exploitation. This, however, ignores the role <strong>of</strong> capital invested in the<br />

harvesting sector. Once it is recognized that a higher discount rate implies<br />

a higher required rate <strong>of</strong> return on capital, the impact <strong>of</strong> the discount rate<br />

2 7 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!