25.07.2014 Views

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

submitted to the <strong>Office</strong> <strong>of</strong> Policy Planning and Evaluation, U.S.<br />

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Economics, Bowdoin College, Brunswick, Maine 04011, September, 35<br />

pp.<br />

The question addressed in this report is whether the available <strong>economics</strong><br />

<strong>literature</strong> provides a basis for estimating the benefits to marine recreation<br />

attributable to the water pollution control programs <strong>of</strong> federal, state, and<br />

local agencies. While numerous techniques exist, estimates <strong>of</strong> net benefit<br />

from water quality improvements are not consistent. No direct evidence exists<br />

that supports the contention that the Federal Water Pollution Control Act<br />

(FWPCA) <strong>of</strong> 1972 has actual improved the recreational fishing experience. It<br />

appears that the upper bound estimates <strong>of</strong> fishing benefits from the FWPCA<br />

should not exceed $1 billion per year.<br />

Freeman, A. Myrick III (1995). "The Benefits <strong>of</strong> Water Quality<br />

Improvements for Marine Recreation: A Review <strong>of</strong> the Empirical<br />

Evidence." Marine Resource Economics, 10(4):385-406.<br />

This paper reviews the empirical <strong>literature</strong> on the economic value <strong>of</strong><br />

marine recreation fishing, beach visits, and boating. Questions addressed<br />

include: What values do people place on changes in the attributes <strong>of</strong><br />

recreation sites and activities? What do we know about how water pollution<br />

control policy affects these attributes? And, is it feasible to use the value<br />

information obtained for specific sites and/or activities to estimate the<br />

benefits <strong>of</strong> improving marine water quality? The <strong>literature</strong> establishes that<br />

some measures <strong>of</strong> pollution reduce the values <strong>of</strong> trips to beaches and that<br />

improved fishing success is valued by recreational anglers. However, there is<br />

substantial variation in value measures across studies. Welfare estimates can<br />

be sensitive to model specification and estimation. In the case <strong>of</strong> marine<br />

recreational fishing, the links between pollution control policy and the<br />

attributes <strong>of</strong> the activity that people value (catch rate) have not been<br />

established.<br />

Freund, R.J. and R.R. Wilson (1974). "An Example <strong>of</strong> a Gravity Model to<br />

Estimate Recreation Travel." Journal <strong>of</strong> Leisure Research, 6:241-<br />

256.<br />

A gravity model to explain recreational travel and participation in<br />

Texas is estimated.<br />

Fricke, Peter H. (1992). "Guidance for Social Impact Assessment for<br />

Marine Fishery Management and Planning." Draft report, USDOC,<br />

NOAA, NMFS, Silver Springs, MD.<br />

This document provides fishery managers with an understanding <strong>of</strong> the<br />

objectives and techniques <strong>of</strong> Sociological Impact Assessment.<br />

Fricke, Peter H. (1994). "Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Limited<br />

Entry Program: Interim Summary Information on Appeals Received."<br />

Position paper presented at the Limited Access Workshop, Seattle,<br />

Washington, November 1-3. National Marine Fisheries Service,<br />

Northwest Regional <strong>Office</strong>, Seattle, Washington.<br />

A review <strong>of</strong> the appeals process for the Pacific coast groundfish fishery<br />

limited entry program. Approximately 44 percent <strong>of</strong> denied applications or 16<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> all applications were appealed. Of the appeals decided (76 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> total), 23 percent were granted.<br />

2 0 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!