25.07.2014 Views

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fisher, Anthony C., John Krutilla, and Charles J. Cicchetti (1972).<br />

"The Economics <strong>of</strong> Environmental Preservation: A Theoretical and<br />

Empirical Analysis." The American Economic Review, 62:605-619.<br />

Krutilla has argued that private market allocations are likely to<br />

preserve less than the socially optimal amount <strong>of</strong> natural environments.<br />

Moreover, he concludes that the optimal amount is likely to be increasing over<br />

time - a particularly serious problem in view <strong>of</strong> the irreversibility <strong>of</strong> many<br />

environmental transformations. This paper extends Krutilla's discussion in<br />

two ways. First, a model is developed for the allocation <strong>of</strong> natural<br />

environments between preservation and development. Then, the model is applied<br />

to the Hells Canyon issue <strong>of</strong> whether it should remain in its natural state or<br />

be developed as a hydroelectric facility.<br />

Fisher, Mark R. and Robert B. Ditton (1991). "Characteristics <strong>of</strong> U.S.<br />

Tournament Billfish Anglers in the Atlantic Ocean." Draft report<br />

submitted to Marine Fisheries Review, pp. 20.<br />

A mail survey <strong>of</strong> 1,984 U.S. billfish tournament anglers was completed to<br />

examine their fishing activity, attitudes, trip expenditures, consumer's<br />

surplus, catch levels, and management preferences. A sample <strong>of</strong> 1,984 anglers<br />

was drawn from billfish tournaments in the western Atlantic Ocean during 1989.<br />

A response rate <strong>of</strong> 61 percent was obtained. Anglers averaged 13 billfish<br />

trips per year, catching a billfish 40 percent <strong>of</strong> the time. Eighty-nine<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> billfish caught were released with less than one billfish per year<br />

per angler retained. Catch and retention rates varied by region. Expenditures<br />

averaged $1,600 per trip, but varied by region. The annual consumers's<br />

surplus was $262 per angler, but increased to $448 per angler if billfish<br />

populations were to increase. An estimated 7,915 tournament anglers in the<br />

U.S. western Atlantic spent $179 million in pursuit <strong>of</strong> billfish in 1989.<br />

Anglers opposed management options that would diminish their ability to catch<br />

a billfish, but supported options limiting the number <strong>of</strong> billfish landed.<br />

Fisher, Mark R. and Robert B. Ditton (1992). "A Social and Economic<br />

Characterization <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Gulf <strong>of</strong> Mexico Recreational Shark<br />

Fishery." Draft report, Department <strong>of</strong> Wildlife and Fisheries<br />

Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, July.<br />

A mail survey <strong>of</strong> tournament shark anglers and party boat shark anglers<br />

was completed to examine their fishing activity, attitudes, trip expenditures,<br />

and consumer surplus. A sample <strong>of</strong> 700 shark anglers was selected from<br />

tournaments in the Gulf <strong>of</strong> Mexico during 1990, and a sample <strong>of</strong> party boat<br />

shark anglers was drawn from Port Aransas, Texas party boat anglers during the<br />

summer <strong>of</strong> 1991. A response rate <strong>of</strong> 58% (excluding non-deliverables) was<br />

obtained from tournament anglers. The sample <strong>of</strong> party boat shark anglers was<br />

too small to provide useful results. Tournament shark anglers reported<br />

fishing an average <strong>of</strong> 58 days per year and targeted sharks and other large<br />

marine species. Tournaments occupy a small portion <strong>of</strong> their fishing effort.<br />

If this group <strong>of</strong> anglers were not able to fish for sharks, one-third indicated<br />

no other species would be an acceptable substitute, while others were willing<br />

to substitute other large marine species. Shark trip expenditures averaged<br />

$197 per trip with a consumer surplus <strong>of</strong> $111 per trip. Based on MRFSS<br />

estimates <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> shark fishing trips, we estimate a total <strong>of</strong> $43<br />

million was spent by shark anglers in the Gulf <strong>of</strong> Mexico with a consumer<br />

surplus <strong>of</strong> $24 million for a gross value <strong>of</strong> the shark fishery <strong>of</strong> $66 million.<br />

MRFSS estimates <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> sharks landed indicate an equivalent use<br />

value <strong>of</strong> $183 per shark. Logit model results appear incorrect, no explanation<br />

<strong>of</strong> consumer surplus derivation is given, no underlying economic model is<br />

provided.<br />

1 9 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!