25.07.2014 Views

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

annotated bibliography of fisheries economics literature - Office of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This paper reviews the workings and expected benefits <strong>of</strong> ITQs, the<br />

origin and concept <strong>of</strong> ITQs, the problems they were designed to address, worldwide<br />

experience and <strong>literature</strong> on ITQs, and the problems and prospects for ITQ<br />

management. Particular attention will be given to the growing importance <strong>of</strong><br />

markets as the primary organizing principle for many <strong>fisheries</strong>, including the<br />

roles <strong>of</strong> ITQs and increased global integration <strong>of</strong> <strong>fisheries</strong> markets.<br />

Squires, Dale, Steven Freese, James Herkelrath, and Samuel F. Herrick,<br />

Jr. (1997). "Cost-Benefit Analysis <strong>of</strong> Pacific Whiting<br />

Allocation." Administrative Report LJ-97-05, National Marine<br />

Fisheries Service, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, P.O. Box<br />

271, La Jolla, California, April.<br />

Cost-benefit analysis evaluated three alternatives to measure the net<br />

economic benefits to the nation <strong>of</strong> allocating Pacific whiting among three user<br />

groups. These groups were the <strong>of</strong>fshore catcher-processors, catcher vessels<br />

delivering to motherships, and to catcher vessels delivering to onshore<br />

producers <strong>of</strong> surimi, headed and gutted, and fillets. Net economic benefits<br />

were measured as the present value <strong>of</strong> producer surplus and were evaluated over<br />

a twenty year time horizon starting in 1997. For the first time in fishery<br />

<strong>economics</strong>, an attempt was made to include fixed costs. However, data on fixed<br />

costs proved inadequate for a detailed analysis, and the analysis confined<br />

itself to net benefits measured using total revenues and variable (operating)<br />

economic costs.<br />

Squires, Dale, Harry Campbell, Stephen Cunningham, Christopher Dewees, R.<br />

Quentin Grafton, Samuel F. Herrick, Jr., James Kirkley, Sean Pascoe,<br />

Kjell Salvanes, Bruce Shallard, Bruce Turris, and Niels Vestergaard<br />

(1998). Individual Transferable Quotas in Multispecies Fisheries. <br />

Marine Policy, 22(2):135-159.<br />

This paper examines the multispecies harvesting technology; addresses<br />

discards, highgrading, and overages under ITQs and lists the possible<br />

solutions to the problems; details possible impacts <strong>of</strong> ITQs on other<br />

<strong>fisheries</strong>; discusses the effects <strong>of</strong> ITQs on the harvesting flexibility <strong>of</strong><br />

fishers; examines how the prices <strong>of</strong> ITQ shares are formed in multispecies<br />

<strong>fisheries</strong> and the effect <strong>of</strong> the harvesting technology and transaction costs on<br />

quota share prices; evaluates how ITQs may affect economic efficiency and<br />

over-capitalization; describes the nature <strong>of</strong> the resource rents that may arise<br />

with ITQs; reviews problems with monitoring and enforcement; present options<br />

for setting ITQs; and provides concluding remarks.<br />

Staniford, Andrew (1988). "The Effects <strong>of</strong> the Pot Reduction in the<br />

South Australian Southern Zone Rock Lobster Fishery." Marine<br />

Resource Economics, 4:271-288.<br />

Previous research has shown that the South Australian Southern Zone rock<br />

lobster fishery is economically overexploited, implying that a reduction in<br />

fishing effort will improve economic efficiency in the fishery. A scheme,<br />

consisting <strong>of</strong> a mandatory pot reduction <strong>of</strong> 15% and the replacement <strong>of</strong> the<br />

pot/vessel allocation formula with minimum and maximum pot entitlements <strong>of</strong> 25<br />

and 80, respectively, was introduced in the fishery in September 1984 for this<br />

purpose. Analyses <strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> the scheme on fishing effort and the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> fishermen and some observations on the response <strong>of</strong> fishermen to the<br />

scheme are provided. While the pot reduction has had a small effect on<br />

fishing effort, it has failed to induce significant rationalization within the<br />

fishery. Remaining fishermen have responded by working a smaller number <strong>of</strong><br />

pots more intensively than they had prior to the introduction <strong>of</strong> the scheme.<br />

6 3 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!