dogu-turkistan-sempozyumu

Important Crossroads and the Chinese Occupation in the History of Eastern Turkistan / Prof Alaeddin YalcinkayaEndnotes1 Great Soviet Encyclopaedia, Third Edition, V. 26, p.458.2 İklil Kurban, Şarki Türkistan Cumhuriyeti, Ankara,1992.3 Dr. Baymirza Hayit, “Sovyetler Birliği ve HürDünya Açısından Türkistan’ın Stratejik Önemi”,T.D.A.D., pp. 78-86.4 Barthold, “Türkistan”, Entsiklopediçeskiy Slovar(Petersburg, 1902), V. 34, p. 174-204, mentionedby Hayit, B., “Türkistan Terimi Üzerine”, TDAD,53, no. 22. Also, for an analysis of Arabic sourcesand travel-books, as well as the historical featuresand borders of Turkistan, see: Turkestan Down tothe Mongol Invasion, London, 1928, pp. 64-179,under the title of “A Geographical Journey toTransoxiana”. For more concise explanations andthe geographical structure of Turkistan, see: Togan,Bugünkü Türkili, pp. 1-22.5 Togan, Bugünkü Türkili, p. 1.6 Mehmet Saray, Doğu Türkistan Türkleri Tarihi,C.1, II. Edition, Istanbul, Doğu Türkistan Vakfı,1998, pp.34-37.7 Saray, Ibid., p. 68,70.8 Paul Henze, “Kaşgariya’daki Büyük Oyun”, DoğuTürkistan’ın Sesi, V-19, Autumn 1988, p. 17.This article by Henze is a translation of the textpresented in English at a seminar organized bythe Eastern Turkistan Foundation on 6 August,1988. Henze extended this article with two furtherstudies relying on Chinese sources, and publishedunder the title: “The Great Game in Kashgaria-British and Russian Missions to Yakub Beg”;Central Asian Survey, vol. VIII, 2, 1989, pp. 61-95.For a complete recent history of the region,see: Atıf Mehmed, Kaşgar Tarihi, İstanbul, 1300;Yusuf Halaçoğlu, “Binbaşı İsmail Hakkı Bey’inKaşgar’a Dâir Eseri”, İ.Ü.E.F. Tarih EnstitüsüDergisi, no. 13, 1987 (Prof. Dr. İbrahim KafesoğluSpecial Edition), pp. 521-550; C.P. Skrine, “TheRoads to Kashgar”, J.R.C.A.S., XII, 1925, pp.226-250; Isenbike Togan, “The Khojas of EasternTurkistan”, Islam as a Source of Identity, ed. Jo-AnnGross, Durham and London, Duke University,1992, pp. 134-148; W. Bosshard, “Politics andTrade in Central Asia”, J.R.C.A.S., 16, 1929, pp.432-457; Sir Henry Trotter, Colonel, “The AmirYakub Khan and Eastern Turkistan in Mid-Nineteenth Century”, Journal of the Royal CentralAsiatic Studies, vol. IV, 1917, pp. 94-112; OwenLattimore, “The Chinese as a Dominant Race”,J.R.C.A.S., 15, 1928, pp. 278-300.9 For details, see.: Alaeddin Yalçınkaya, SömürgecilikPan-İslamizm Işığında Türkistan, 1856’danGünümüze, 2nd edition, Ankara, Lalezar Kitabevi,2006.10 Togan, Bugünkü Türkili, p. 237.11 Saray, Türkistan Hanlıkları, p. 45, 100. Togan,stating that Yakub Beg had been sent by theHokand amir and that he was also supported byhim in his struggle In Eastern Turkistan, claimsthat the region from the east of Hoten to AmuDerya could be regarded as having been annexed tothe Hokand amir, Hudayar Khan, until late 1867;Bugünkü Türkili, p. 218.12 The “Atalik Gazi” and “Kusbeyi”, as mentioned InBritish documents are one and the same person asYakub Khan. The title of “Atalik Gazi” was grantedto Yakub Khan by the Bukhara amir. After thevisit of Yakub Beg’s ambassador to Istanbul in1873, Yakub Beg was granted the title of “Amir”by Sultan Abdulaziz and pronounced “Amir YakubKhan”; Bayur, Hindistan Tarihi, III, pp. 402, 403. Ihave observed that people of Turkistan today preferto use the title “Be-Devlet”.305