17.02.2015 Views

הוראת סיפור הנס המקראי בחינוך הממלכתי בישראל - האוניברסיטה העברית ...

הוראת סיפור הנס המקראי בחינוך הממלכתי בישראל - האוניברסיטה העברית ...

הוראת סיפור הנס המקראי בחינוך הממלכתי בישראל - האוניברסיטה העברית ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

such as difficulties within the text, as well as second-order ones, such as the exegete's<br />

philosophy, his cultural presuppositions, or his polemical concerns.<br />

Clearly the thinking that characterized medieval exegesis is not entirely consonant<br />

with that of modern hermeneutics. For example, a modern metaphorical reading will<br />

be expected to conform to lexical clues and to adhere as much as possible to the<br />

simple meaning of the text. Medieval commentators, on the other hand, sometimes<br />

allow themselves the freedom of departing radically from the peshat when<br />

interpreting metaphorically. Nevertheless, there is a certain degree of correlation<br />

between the approaches and presuppositions of different contemporary hermeneutical<br />

schools and those of corresponding schools of classical exegesis: (a) The reverence<br />

towards the text characteristic of traditional Jewish exegesis also typifies the schools<br />

of authorial intent and New Criticism. All these approaches posit that the text has an<br />

inherent meaning, which needs to be deciphered using objective, rather than<br />

subjective, tools, even though different schools and different individual exegetes may<br />

differ regarding the precise nature of these tools. (b) The assumption of many<br />

classical exegetes that answers to their philosophical or ideological concerns may be<br />

found hidden in the biblical text, parallels the assumption of the reader response<br />

school that the perplexities and concerns of the reader play a central role in<br />

ascertaining the meaning of texts. (c) Attempts by exegetes to reconcile miracle<br />

stories with their view of science and philosophy included adoption of various reading<br />

strategies, often involving metaphorical approaches and sometimes involving close<br />

reading techniques, all of which are characteristic of modern commentators. (d) The<br />

legitimacy accorded by some classical commentators to exercising personal<br />

preferences in choosing among interpretive options parallels the modern awareness of<br />

318

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!