Le protesi <strong>di</strong>scali lombari a B C D BIBLIOGraFIa 1 Pai S, Sundaram LJ. Low back pain: an economic assessment in the United States. Orthop Clin N Am 2004;35:1-5. 2 Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P, et al. Swe<strong>di</strong>sh Lumbar Spine Study Group. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Stu<strong>di</strong>es: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swe<strong>di</strong>sh Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 2001;26:2521-32. S222 Fig. 41. 3 anni follow-up: ra<strong>di</strong>ografie LS in AP, LL, massima flessione e massima estensione. A 2 anni dall’intervento è stato necessario nuovo intervento artrodesi posteriore L6-S1 per patologia giunzionale inferiore. Caso clinico 6 Paziente: maschio, 43 anni. Diagnosi: <strong>di</strong>scopatia degenerativa primitiva L5-S1 Questionari clinici: SF36 pre-op.: 33/100; 3 anni follow-up: 34/100; VAS pre-op.: 85/100; 3 anni follow-up: 80/100; ODI pre-op.: 60/100; 3 anni follow-up: 66/100 a B C Fig. 42. Pre-op: Rx LS in AP e LL; RMN. a B Fig. 43. 1 anni follow-up: Rx LS in AP, LL, flex-ext. evidente malposizionamento della protesi. C D Fig. 44. 3 anni follow-up: Rx LS in AP e LL. È stato necessario intervento rimozione protesi e artrodesi anteriore strumentata. 3 Atlas SJ, Nar<strong>di</strong>n RA. Evaluation and treatment of low back pain: an evidence-based approach to clinical care. Muscle Nerve 2003;27:265-84. 4 Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Deyo RA, et al. A review of the evidence for the effectiveness, safety, and cost of acupuncture, massage therapy, and spinal manipulation for back pain. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:898-906. 5 O’Beirne J, O’Neill D, Gallagher J, et al. Spinal fusion for back pain: a clinical and ra<strong>di</strong>ological review. J Spinal Disord 1992;5:32-8. 6 Frelinghuysen P, Huang RC, Girar<strong>di</strong> FP, et al. Lumbar total <strong>di</strong>sc replacement a B
part I: rationale, biomechanics, and implant types. Orthop Clin North Am 2005;36:293-9. 7 Siepe CJ, Mayer HM, Heinz-Leisenheimer M, et al. Total lumbar <strong>di</strong>sc replacement. Different results for <strong>di</strong>fferent levels. Spine 2007;32:782-90. 8 Cauchoix J, David T. Arthrodeses lombaires: resultats apres plus de 10 ans. Rev Chir Orthop 1985;71:263-8. 9 Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, et al. Patient outcomes after lumbar spinal fusions. JAMA 1992;268:907-11. 10 Boden SD, Balderston RA, Heller JG, et al. An AOA critical issue. Disc replacement: this time will we really cure low back and neck pain. J Bone Joint Surg 2004;86:411-22. 11 Bono CM, Lee CK. Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative <strong>di</strong>sc <strong>di</strong>sease over the past 20 years: influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcome. Spine 2004;29:455-63. 12 Akamaru T, Kawahara N, Yoon ST, et al. Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in <strong>di</strong>fferent sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 2003;28:1560-6. 13 Auerbach JD, Wills BP, McIntosh TC, et al. Evaluation of spinal kinematics following lumbar total <strong>di</strong>sc replacement and circumferential fusion using in vivo fluoroscopy. Spine 2007;32:527-36. 14 Shono Y, Kaneda K, Abumi K, et al. Stability of posterior spinal instrumentation and its effects on adjacent motion segments in the lumbosacral spine. Spine 1998;23:1550-8. 15 Saal JS. General principles of <strong>di</strong>agnostic testing as related to painful lumbar spine <strong>di</strong>sorders: a critical appraisal of current <strong>di</strong>agnostic techniques. Spine 2002;27:2538-45. 16 Carragee EJ, Hannibal M. Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain. Orthop Clin N Am 2004;35:7-16. 17 Hannibal M, Thomas DJ, Low J, et al. ProDisc-L total <strong>di</strong>sc replacement: a comparison of 1-level versus 2-level arthroplasty patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Spine 2007;32:2322-6. 18 Anderson PA, Rouleau JP. Intervertebral <strong>di</strong>sc arthroplasty. Spine 2004;29:2779-86. 19 Guyer RD, Tromanhauser SG, Regan JJ. An economic model of one-level lumbar arthroplasty versus fusion. Spine J 2007;7:558-62. 20 Freeman BJ, Davenport J. Total <strong>di</strong>sc replacement in the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2006;15:S439-47. 21 Lei GH, Li KH, Liu SL, et al. Stability of lumbar spine after artificial <strong>di</strong>sc replacement. Zhong Nan Da Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2006;31:728-31. 22 An HS. Artificial <strong>di</strong>sc replacement: progress or hype? Am J Orthop 2006;35:405. 23 Rousseau MA, Bradford DS, Bertagnoli R, et al. Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces. Spine J 2006;6:258-66. 24 Leivseth G, Braaten S, Frobin W, et al. Mobility of lumbar segments instrumented with a ProDisc-II prosthesis: a two-year follow-up study. Spine 2006;31:1726-33. 25 Le Huec JC, Mathews H, Basso Y, et al. Clinical results of Maverick lumbar total <strong>di</strong>sc replacement: two-year prospective follow-up. Orthop Clin North Am 2005;36:315-22. 26 Delamarter RB, Bae HW, Pradhan BB. Clinical results of ProDisc-II lumbar total <strong>di</strong>sc replacement: report from the United States Clinical Trial. Orthop Clin N Am 2005;36:301-13. 27 Le Huec JC, Mathews H, Basso Y, et al. Clinical results of Maverick lumbar total <strong>di</strong>sc replacement: two-year prospective follow-up. Orthop Clin North Am 2005;36:315-22. 28 Bertagnoli R, Marnay T, Mayer HM, e<strong>di</strong>tors. Total <strong>di</strong>sc replacement. Tuttlingen: Spine Solutions GmbH 2003. 29 Huang RC, Gira<strong>di</strong> FP, Cammisa FP. The prevalence of contrain<strong>di</strong>cations to total <strong>di</strong>sc replacement in a cohort of lumbar surgical patient. Spine 2004;29:2538. 30 Chin KR. Epidemiology of in<strong>di</strong>cations and contrain<strong>di</strong>cations to total <strong>di</strong>sc replacement in an academic practice. Spine J 2007;7:392-8. 31 Wolfe HJ, Putschar WG, Vickery AL. Role of the notochord in human intervertebral <strong>di</strong>sk. I. Fetus and infant. Clin Orthop 1965;39:205-12. 32 Panjabi MM, White AA III. Physical properties and functional biomechanics of the spine. In: Panjabi MM, White AA III, e<strong>di</strong>tors. Clinical biomechanics of the spine. Second e<strong>di</strong>tion. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company 1990. D.a. Fabris Monterumici, r. Sinigaglia 33 Panagiotacopulos ND, Pope MH, Block R, et al. Water content in human intervertebral <strong>di</strong>sc. Part II. Viscoelastic behaviour. Spine 1987;12:918. 34 Bernick S, Cailliet R. Vertebral end-plate changes with aging of human vertebrae. Spine 1982;7:97. 35 Whalen JL, Parke WW, Mazur JM, et al. The intrinsic vasculature of developing vertebral end plates and its nutritive significance to the intervertebral <strong>di</strong>scs. J Pe<strong>di</strong>atr Orthop 1985;5:403-10. 36 Coppes MH, Marani E, Thomeer RT, et al. Innervation of “painful” lumbar <strong>di</strong>scs. Spine 1997;22:2342-50. 37 Antonacci MD, Mody DR, Heggeness MH. Innervation of the human vertebral body: a histologic study. J Spinal Disord 1998;11:526-31. 38 Virgin W. Experimental investigations into physical properties of intervertebral <strong>di</strong>sc. J Bone Joint Surg B 1951;33:607. 39 Nachemson A, Morris JM. In vivo measurements of intra<strong>di</strong>scal pressuare. J Bone Joint Surg 1964;46:1077. 40 Brown T, Hanson R, Yorra A. Some mechanical tests on the lumbo-sacral spine with particolar referente to the intervertebral <strong>di</strong>scs. J Bone Joint Surg 1957;39:1135. 41 Farfan HF, Cossette JW, Robertson GH, et al. The effects of torsion on the lumbar intervertebral joints: the role of torsion in the production of <strong>di</strong>sc degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg 1970;52:468. 42 Kazarian LE. Creep characteristics of the human spinal column. Orthop Clin North Am 1975;6:3. 43 Kelsey JL, Hardy RJ. Driving of motor vehicles as a risk factor for acute herniated intervertebral <strong>di</strong>sc. Am J Epidemiol 1975;102:63. 44 Nachemson A. Some mechanical properties of the lumbar intervertebral <strong>di</strong>sc. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 1962;23:130-2. 45 Fernstrom U. Arthroplasty with intercorporal endoprosthesis in herniated <strong>di</strong>sc and in painful <strong>di</strong>sc. Acta Chir Scand <strong>Suppl</strong> 1966;10:287-9. 46 Fernstrom U. Der bandscheibenersatz mit erhaltung der beweglichkeit. In Herdman H, ed. Zukunftaufgaben fur <strong>di</strong>e erforschung und behandelung von Wirbelsaulenleiden. Die wirbelsaule in forschung und praxis. Stuttgart: Hippokrates 1972. 47 Harmon PH. Anterior excision and vertebral body fusion operation for intervertebral <strong>di</strong>sc syndromes of the lower lumbar spine. Clin Orthop 1966;26:107-11. 48 Fassio B, Ginestie JF. Protèse <strong>di</strong>scale en silicone. Etude esperimentale et premières observations cliniques. Nouv Press Med 1978;21:207. 49 Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Mayer M. Spine arthroplasty: a historical review. Eur Spine J 2002;11:S65-84. 50 Steffee AD. The Steffee artificial <strong>di</strong>sc. In Weinstein JN, ed. Clinical efficacy and outcome in <strong>di</strong>agnosis and treatment of low back pain. New York: Raven Press 1992. 51 Enker P, Steffee A, Mcmillin C, et al. Artificial <strong>di</strong>sc replacement. Preliminary report with a 3-year minimum follow-up. Spine 1993;18:1061-70. 52 Buttner-Jans K, Schellnack K, Zippel H. Biomechanics of the SB Charité lumbar intervertebral <strong>di</strong>sc endoprosthesis. Int Orthop 1989;13:173-6. 53 Putzier M, Funk JF, Schneider SV, et al. Charité total <strong>di</strong>sc replacement-clinical and ra<strong>di</strong>ographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years. Eur Spine J 2006;15:183-95. 54 Marnay T. L’arthroplastie intervertebrale lombaire. Med Orthop 1991;25:48-55. 55 Mathews H, Le Huec JC, Bertagnoli R, et al. Design rationale and early multicenter evaluation of Maverick total <strong>di</strong>sc arthroplasty. International Meeting on Advanced Spine Technologies, Montreux, 2002. 56 Le Huec JC, Meyrat R, Aunoble S, et al. Surgical technique of lumbar <strong>di</strong>sc arthroplasty: pre-operative workup, surgical technique and interest of navigation. In Hovorka I, Farcy JP, e<strong>di</strong>tors. Spine concepts 2007. Montpellier: Sauramps Mé<strong>di</strong>cal 2007:139-149. 57 Ma<strong>di</strong> K, Aunoble S, Dehoux E, et al. Anatomic variations of the ilio-caval junction encountered in <strong>di</strong>sk prosthesis implantation. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2006;92:112-7. 58 Tribus CB, Belanger T. The vascular anatomy anterior to the L5-S1 <strong>di</strong>sk space. Spine 2001;26:1205-8. 59 Baker JK, Reardon PR, Reardon MJ, et al. Vascular injury in anterior lumbar surgery. Spine 1993;18:2227-30. S223
- Page 1 and 2:
Organo ufficiale della Società Ita
- Page 3 and 4:
Indice INDICE MAIN SESSION I - Mala
- Page 5 and 6:
INDICE MAIN SESSION VII - Ingegneri
- Page 7:
INDICE Matematizzazione di un’ost
- Page 10 and 11:
L’endocrinologo e le malattie del
- Page 12 and 13:
L’endocrinologo e le malattie del
- Page 14 and 15:
La chirurgia nell’artropatia ocro
- Page 16 and 17:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S8-S12 C
- Page 18 and 19:
Chirurgia delle fratture da fragili
- Page 20 and 21:
Chirurgia delle fratture da fragili
- Page 22 and 23:
Overview del radiologo interventist
- Page 24 and 25:
Durable Cure and reconstructive Suc
- Page 26 and 27:
Scelta del trattamento nelle metast
- Page 28 and 29:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S20-S23
- Page 30 and 31:
Trattamento chirurgico delle metast
- Page 32 and 33:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S24-S29
- Page 34 and 35:
Protocollo di trattamento delle met
- Page 36 and 37:
Protocollo di trattamento delle met
- Page 38 and 39:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S30-S34
- Page 40 and 41:
Il trattamento chirurgico delle les
- Page 42 and 43:
Il trattamento chirurgico delle les
- Page 44 and 45:
L’apparato locomotore nelle malat
- Page 46 and 47:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S38-S42
- Page 48 and 49:
Il trattamento chirurgico nel mielo
- Page 50 and 51:
Il trattamento chirurgico nel mielo
- Page 52 and 53:
Indicazioni chirurgiche nelle local
- Page 54 and 55:
Indicazioni chirurgiche nelle local
- Page 56 and 57:
Indicazioni chirurgiche nelle local
- Page 58 and 59:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S50-S55
- Page 60 and 61:
Chirurgia protesica primaria e di r
- Page 62 and 63:
Chirurgia protesica primaria e di r
- Page 64 and 65:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S56-S59
- Page 66 and 67:
Overview sulle malattie infettive d
- Page 68 and 69:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S60-S62
- Page 70 and 71:
Bacterial biofilms: the ultimate ca
- Page 72 and 73:
Le infezioni tubercolari dell’app
- Page 74 and 75:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S66-S69
- Page 76 and 77:
L’artrite infettiva ematogena ogg
- Page 78 and 79:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S70-S75
- Page 80 and 81:
Le infezioni dell’arto superiore
- Page 82 and 83:
Le infezioni dell’arto superiore
- Page 84 and 85:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S76 What
- Page 86 and 87:
Spondilodisciti non tubercolari za
- Page 88 and 89:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S80-S82
- Page 90 and 91:
La sinovialectomia artroscopica nel
- Page 92 and 93:
La chirurgia del piede reumatoide
- Page 94 and 95:
La chirurgia del piede reumatoide I
- Page 96 and 97:
La chirurgia del piede reumatoide a
- Page 98 and 99:
La chirurgia del piede reumatoide F
- Page 100 and 101:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S92-S96
- Page 102 and 103:
La coxopatia nella spondilite anchi
- Page 104 and 105:
La coxopatia nella spondilite anchi
- Page 106 and 107:
L’anca nell’artrite reumatoide
- Page 108 and 109:
L’anca nell’artrite reumatoide
- Page 110 and 111:
L’anca nell’artrite reumatoide
- Page 112 and 113:
La protesizzazione della caviglia n
- Page 114 and 115:
La protesizzazione della caviglia n
- Page 116 and 117:
aspetti genetici delle osteocondrod
- Page 118 and 119:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S110-S11
- Page 120 and 121:
La chirurgia del nanismo disarmonic
- Page 122 and 123:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S114-S12
- Page 124 and 125:
La malattia esostosante in età ped
- Page 126 and 127:
La malattia esostosante in età ped
- Page 128 and 129:
La malattia esostosante in età ped
- Page 130 and 131:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S122-S12
- Page 132 and 133:
Trattamento chirurgico della scolio
- Page 134 and 135:
Trattamenti ortopedici nella distro
- Page 136 and 137:
Trattamenti ortopedici nella distro
- Page 138 and 139:
Trattamenti ortopedici nella distro
- Page 140 and 141:
L’imaging nelle malattie sistemic
- Page 142 and 143:
L’imaging nelle malattie sistemic
- Page 144 and 145:
Tecniche innovative per la fabbrica
- Page 146 and 147:
Scaffolds e cartilagine essere sche
- Page 148 and 149:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S140 Chi
- Page 150 and 151:
Protesi biologiche progressivamente
- Page 152 and 153:
Protesi biologiche Fig. 3. Allograf
- Page 154 and 155:
Protesi biologiche 22 Meyers MH, Jo
- Page 156 and 157:
La riparazione delle lesioni della
- Page 158 and 159:
La riparazione delle lesioni della
- Page 160 and 161:
Medicina rigenerativa e uso di cell
- Page 162 and 163:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S154-S15
- Page 164 and 165:
Scaffold 3D a confronto per la rige
- Page 166 and 167:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S158-S16
- Page 168 and 169:
igenerazione cartilaginea Fig. 4. T
- Page 170 and 171:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S162-S16
- Page 172 and 173:
uso di staminali da tessuto perifer
- Page 174 and 175:
Overview Fig. 1. Microstruttura del
- Page 176 and 177:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S168-S17
- Page 178 and 179:
L’impiego del tantalio nelle revi
- Page 180 and 181: L’impiego del tantalio nelle revi
- Page 182 and 183: L’impiego del tantalio nelle revi
- Page 184 and 185: Graft biomimetici-attivi nella chir
- Page 186 and 187: G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S178-S18
- Page 188 and 189: L’avulsione della radice meniscal
- Page 190 and 191: G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S182-S18
- Page 192 and 193: Past, present and future for spinal
- Page 194 and 195: L’artrodesi strumentata della cer
- Page 196 and 197: G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S188-S19
- Page 198 and 199: Il trattamento delle scoliosi in et
- Page 200 and 201: Il trattamento delle scoliosi in et
- Page 202 and 203: G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S194-S19
- Page 204 and 205: Chirurgia mini-invasiva del rachide
- Page 206 and 207: Chirurgia mini-invasiva del rachide
- Page 208 and 209: Le protesi discali lombari vita sen
- Page 210 and 211: Le protesi discali lombari e di mag
- Page 212 and 213: Le protesi discali lombari Fig. 5.
- Page 214 and 215: Le protesi discali lombari bile sol
- Page 216 and 217: Le protesi discali lombari che intr
- Page 218 and 219: Le protesi discali lombari sono sta
- Page 220 and 221: Le protesi discali lombari Fig. 27.
- Page 222 and 223: Le protesi discali lombari (24,8%)
- Page 224 and 225: Le protesi discali lombari Tab. XI.
- Page 226 and 227: Le protesi discali lombari lombari,
- Page 228 and 229: Le protesi discali lombari a B C D
- Page 232 and 233: Le protesi discali lombari 60 Wagne
- Page 234 and 235: Overview dispositivi innovativi in
- Page 236 and 237: G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S228-S22
- Page 238 and 239: G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S230-S23
- Page 240 and 241: Dilops: nuovo concetto di sintesi
- Page 242 and 243: Femoroacetabular impingement OA, wh
- Page 244 and 245: Vantaggi della modularità del coll
- Page 246 and 247: Vantaggi della modularità del coll
- Page 248 and 249: artroscopia d’anca • patologia
- Page 250 and 251: artroscopia d’anca PaTOLOGIa SINO
- Page 252 and 253: artroscopia d’anca ni cartilagine
- Page 254 and 255: artroscopia d’anca L’artroscopi
- Page 256 and 257: artroscopia d’anca La diagnosi cl
- Page 258 and 259: Biomateriali e biotecnologie in chi
- Page 260 and 261: Evoluzione, indicazioni e limiti de
- Page 262 and 263: G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S254-S25
- Page 264 and 265: attuali materiali e tecniche di ost
- Page 266 and 267: G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S258-S26
- Page 268 and 269: Biologia della guarigione della rip
- Page 270 and 271: Protesi di tibiotarsica zione sferi
- Page 272 and 273: G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S264-S26
- Page 274 and 275: Storia ed evoluzione delle protesi
- Page 276 and 277: Storia ed evoluzione delle protesi
- Page 278 and 279: G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S270-S27
- Page 280 and 281:
Matematizzazione di un’osteotomia
- Page 282 and 283:
Mezzi di sintesi e dispositivi inno
- Page 284 and 285:
Mezzi di sintesi e dispositivi inno
- Page 286 and 287:
attuali materiali e tecniche di ost
- Page 288 and 289:
attuali materiali e tecniche di ost
- Page 290 and 291:
Innesti massivi omoplastici nella r
- Page 292 and 293:
Innesti massivi omoplastici nella r
- Page 294 and 295:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S286-S30
- Page 296 and 297:
Novità in tema di artroscopia di p
- Page 298 and 299:
Novità in tema di artroscopia di p
- Page 300 and 301:
Novità in tema di artroscopia di p
- Page 302 and 303:
Novità in tema di artroscopia di p
- Page 304 and 305:
Novità in tema di artroscopia di p
- Page 306 and 307:
Novità in tema di artroscopia di p
- Page 308 and 309:
Novità in tema di artroscopia di p
- Page 310 and 311:
Biomateriali e biotecnologie in chi
- Page 312 and 313:
Biomateriali e biotecnologie in chi
- Page 314 and 315:
Biomateriali e biotecnologie in chi
- Page 316 and 317:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S308-S31
- Page 318 and 319:
attuali materiali e tecniche di ost
- Page 320 and 321:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S312-S31
- Page 322 and 323:
Interfaccia intraneurale per il con
- Page 324 and 325:
Interfaccia intraneurale per il con
- Page 326 and 327:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S318-S32
- Page 328 and 329:
Biomateriali e biotecnologie in chi
- Page 330 and 331:
Instabilità gleno-omerale da difet
- Page 332 and 333:
Innesti ossei in ortopedia: una rev
- Page 334 and 335:
G.I.O.T. 2010;36(suppl. 1):S326-S32
- Page 336:
Indice degli autori Abati C.N., S23