Experimentierendes Lernen in der Bau- und Holztechnik

Untersuchungsansatz der empirischen Evaluation der entwickelten Experimentalkonzeption
Tabelle 5: Related Studies of Corporative Teaching Methods (LIGHTSEY 2000, S. 4)
Author Group N Methods Compared
BRETZ and
THOMPSETT
(1992)
Kodak Corp.
MRP Training
180 Lecture vs.
integration
CARR
(1982)
CARTER
(1995)
JAMES
(1991)
MERRILL
(1995)
THOMS and
KLEIN
(1994)
WARD
(1993)
WELCH
(1990)
WHITE
(1995)
University
(Economics)
University
(physical
training)
Adult
(education)
Adult medical
(cardiac)
Adult
(hospital
management)
Navy
(medical)
University
students
(business)
University
students
(tech)
26 Lecture vs.
Case study
36 Lecture vs.
Case study
31 Lecture vs.
Case study
37 Lecture vs.
self-study
64 Nonparticipation
vs.
participation
300 Nonparticipation
vs.
participation
181 Lecture vs.
Active methods
112 Lecture vs.
computer-aided
training
Instruments Analytic
Methods
Survey,
pretest,
learning
ANOVA
Correlation
posttest
Pretest,
posttest
Survey,
posttest
(only)
Pretest,
posttest
Pretest,
posttest
Survey,
multiple
tests
Survey,
posttest
(only)
Pretest,
posttest
Survey,
pretest,
posttest
T-test
ANOVA
Results
(Learning)
No
difference
P = .01
No
difference
P = .05
MANOVA No
difference
P = .10
ANOVA
T-test
Regression
No
difference
P = .05
ANCOVA No
difference
P = .05
ANOVA
Correlation
Chi-Square
T-test,
ANOVA
No
difference
r = .16
Learning
not assessed
ANOVA No
difference
P = .05
ANOVA No
difference
P = .10
90