15.01.2013 Views

U. Glaeser

U. Glaeser

U. Glaeser

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FIGURE 42.27 Motion estimation process in a block-based video coder.<br />

FIGURE 42.28 Motion prediction in 2 ITU-T video coding standards.<br />

SAD, is considered to most resemble the current MB and referred to as the “best match.” The displacement<br />

vector between the currently coded MB and the matrix that spatially corresponds to its best match in<br />

the previous frame is called the motion vector (MV) and the relative SAD is called the MB residual<br />

matrix. If the smallest SAD is less than a certain threshold then the MB is INTER coded by sending the<br />

MV and the DCT coefficients of the residual matrix, otherwise the MB is INTRA coded. The coordinates<br />

of the MV are transmitted differentially using the coordinates of one or more MVs corresponding to<br />

neighboring MBs (left MB in ITU-T H.261 or left, top, and top right MBs in ITU-T H.263 and ISO<br />

MPEG-4) within the same video frame. Figures 42.27 and 42.28 illustrate the motion estimation and<br />

prediction processes of contemporary video coding algorithms.<br />

Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Perceptual Quality<br />

The performance of a video coding algorithm can be simply subjectively evaluated by visually comparing<br />

the reconstructed video sequence to the original one. Two major types of subjective methods are used<br />

to assess the quality of perceptual video quality. In the first, an overall quality rating is assigned to the<br />

image (usually last decoded frame of a sequence). In the second, quality impairment is induced on a<br />

standard type image until it is completely similar to the reference image or vice versa.<br />

© 2002 by CRC Press LLC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!