15.01.2013 Views

U. Glaeser

U. Glaeser

U. Glaeser

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Gate-Induced Drain Leakage (I 4)<br />

GIDL current arises in the high electric field under the gate/drain overlap region causing deep depletion<br />

[7] and effectively thins out the depletion width of drain to well p-n junction. The high electric field<br />

between gate and drain (a negative V G and high positive V D bias for NMOS transistor) generates carriers<br />

into the substrate and drain from direct band-to-band tunneling, trap-assisted tunneling, or a combination<br />

of thermal emission and tunneling. It is localized along the channel width between the gate<br />

and drain. GIDL is at times referred to as surface band-to-band tunneling leakage. GIDL current is<br />

seen as the “hook” in the waveform of Fig. 16.3 that shows increasing current for negative values of<br />

V G (gate bias dependent specially observed at high V D curves). Thinner T ox and higher V DD (higher<br />

potential between gate and drain) enhance the electric field dependent GIDL. The impact of drain<br />

(and well) doping on GIDL is rather complicated. At low drain doping values, we do not have high<br />

electric field for tunneling to occur. For very high drain doping, the depletion volume for tunneling<br />

will be limited. Hence, GIDL is worse for drain doping values in between the above extremes. Very<br />

high and abrupt drain doping is preferred for minimizing GIDL as it provides lower series resistance<br />

required for high transistor drive current. GIDL is a major obstacle in I OFF reduction. As it was discussed,<br />

a junction related bulk band-to-band tunneling component in I 1 may also contribute to GIDL current,<br />

but this current will not be gate bias dependent. It will only increase baseline value of I 4 current<br />

component.<br />

We isolated I GIDL by measuring source current log(I s) versus V G. It is seen as the dotted line extension<br />

of the V D = 4.0 V curve in Fig. 16.3. I GIDL is removed since it uses the drain and substrate (well) terminals,<br />

not the source terminal. The GIDL contribution to I OFF is small at 2.7 V, but as the drain voltage rises to<br />

4.0 V (close to burn-in voltage), the off-state current on the V D = 4.0 V curve increases from 6 nA (at<br />

the dotted line intersection with V G = 0 V) to 42 nA, for a GIDL of 36 nA. The pure weak inversion and<br />

reverse bias p-n junction current of 99 pA is approximated from the V D = 0.1 V curve.<br />

Punchthrough (I 5)<br />

Punchthrough occurs when the drain and source depletion regions approach each other and electrically<br />

“touch” deep in the channel. Punchthrough is a space-charge condition that allows channel current to<br />

exist deep in the subgate region causing the gate to lose control of the subgate channel region. Punchthrough<br />

current varies quadratically with drain voltage and S t increases reflecting the increase in drain<br />

leakage [8, p. 134]. Punchthrough is regarded as a subsurface version of DIBL.<br />

Narrow Width Effect (I 6)<br />

Transistor V T in nontrench isolated technologies increases for geometric gate widths in the order of ≤0.5 µm.<br />

An opposite and more complex effect is seen for trench isolated technologies that show decrease in V T<br />

for effective channel widths on the order of W ≤ 0.5 µm [9]. No narrow width effect was observed in<br />

our transistor sizes with W >> 0.5 µm.<br />

Gate Oxide Tunneling (I 7)<br />

Gate oxide tunneling current I ox, which is a function of electric field (E ox), can cause direct tunneling<br />

through the gate or Fowler–Nordheim (FN) tunneling through the oxide bands [Eq. (16.1)] [8]. FN<br />

tunneling typically lies at a higher field strength than found at product use conditions and will probably<br />

remain so. FN tunneling has a constant slope for E ox > 6.5 MV/cm (Fig. 16.5). Figure 16.5 shows significant<br />

direct oxide tunneling at lower E ox for thin oxides.<br />

© 2002 by CRC Press LLC<br />

IOX =<br />

A⋅ EOX ⋅ e<br />

2<br />

B<br />

– -------<br />

Eox (16.2)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!