15.01.2013 Views

U. Glaeser

U. Glaeser

U. Glaeser

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

where B = B 1 + B 2 + 1 is the size of the slope table input i.e., the number of data bits used in calculating<br />

the slope. The SLT-based gradient is then,<br />

© 2002 by CRC Press LLC<br />

(34.12)<br />

where the factor of −2 in Eq. (34.8) can be absorbed in the lookup table. In our analysis we need the<br />

slope generating filter coefficients ψ(c). These coefficients ψ(c)s are obtained in the process of numerically<br />

generating the signal slopes, which are correlated with the data.<br />

Phase Detector Properties<br />

Before computing the output noise jitter of the entire timing loop, the properties of the phase detector<br />

must be analyzed. Quantities important for the performance of the phase detector are its KPD and output<br />

noise standard deviation ratio KPD/ sno. The KPD is the ratio of the mean phase detector output to a<br />

constant sampling phase error, τ. The KPD can thus be thought of as the signal gain of the timing loop<br />

where the signal is the sampling phase error. The output noise no(k) is the equivalent noise at the output<br />

of the phase detector for a given input noise n(k) at the phase detector input. The error, e(k), at the<br />

equalizer output is a combination of contributions from the sampling phase error, τ(k) and noise. Let<br />

n(k) represent the noise at the equalizer output (intersymbol interference + filtered equalized noise). We<br />

then have,<br />

The phase detector output, ∆(k), is then<br />

(34.13)<br />

(34.14)<br />

Figure 34.25 shows in detail the timing loop of Fig. 34.22 with the details of the SLT phase detector and<br />

the composition of the error signal from the sampling phase and noise per Eq. (34.13).<br />

Now find the statistical properties of KPD and n o using E as the expectation operator. For a tractable<br />

analysis we assume n(k) is AWG. To easily relate σ n to the error event rate (EER) at the output of the<br />

Viterbi detector, we assume that channel errors are dominated by a minimum distance error event (with<br />

distance d min).<br />

τin<br />

τout<br />

τ (k)<br />

(T)<br />

FIGURE 34.25 Timing loop with SLT phase detector.<br />

∆( k)<br />

= e( k)sˆ(<br />

k)<br />

e( k)<br />

= t( k)s(<br />

k)<br />

+ n( k)<br />

∆( k)<br />

= [ t( k)s(<br />

k)<br />

+ n( k)<br />

]sˆ( k)<br />

= t( k)s(<br />

k)sˆ(<br />

k)<br />

+ no( k)<br />

n(k) (LSB)<br />

(LSB)<br />

s(k)(LSB/T)<br />

d(k)<br />

e(k) (LSB)<br />

s n<br />

=<br />

d min/2<br />

Q −1 -----------------------<br />

( EER)<br />

Phase Detector<br />

Slope Lookup<br />

Table (SLT)<br />

s(k)<br />

∆(k)<br />

(LSB)<br />

DPLL<br />

Filter<br />

T(z)<br />

KV<br />

(T/LSB)<br />

(34.15)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!