15.01.2013 Views

U. Glaeser

U. Glaeser

U. Glaeser

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

longitudinal fields such as ring heads. Similarly, some media are composed of crystallites oriented<br />

perpendicularly to the field. Such media have a much higher remanent magnetization in the perpendicular<br />

direction, and favor perpendicular recording. If a head design promotes perpendicular fields, such as<br />

single pole heads, the result is perpendicularly recorded magnetization.<br />

Some recent experiments have shown that media that favor perpendicular recording have better thermal<br />

stability. This is why, lately, perpendicular recording is attracting a considerable attention in magnetic<br />

recording community. Typically, in perpendicular recording a recording surface is made of a hard<br />

ferromagnetic material, i.e., material requiring large applied fields to permanently magnetize it. Once<br />

magnetized, the domains remain very stable, i.e., large fields are required to reverse the magnetization.<br />

The recording layer is made thick so that, since each magnetic domain contains a large number of<br />

magnetic particles, larger energy is required for demagnetization. The low remanence, low coercivity,<br />

materials (the so-called soft materials) are placed beneath hard ferromagnetic surface (soft underlayer)<br />

and used to conduct magnetic field back to another electromagnet pole. A pole-head geometry is used,<br />

so that the medium can effectively travel through the head gap, and be exposed to stronger magnetic<br />

field. A pole-head/soft-underlayer configuration can produce about twice the field that a ring head<br />

produces. In this way sharp transitions can be supported on relatively thick perpendicular media, and<br />

high frequencies (that get attenuated during readback) are written firmly. However, effects of demagnetizing<br />

fields are much more pronounced in perpendicular recording systems, because in longitudinal<br />

media the transitions are not that sharp.<br />

Physical Limits on Recording Density<br />

At extremely high areal densities each bit of information is written on a very small area. The track width<br />

is small and magnetic domains contain relatively small numbers of magnetic particles. Because the particles<br />

have random positions and sizes, large statistical fluctuations or noise on the recovered signal can occur.<br />

The signal-to-noise ratio is proportional to the track width, and is inversely proportional to the mean size<br />

of the particle and the standard deviation of the particle size. Therefore, increasing the track size, increasing<br />

the number of particles by increasing media thickness, and decreasing the particle size will improve the<br />

signal-to-noise ratio. Uniaxial orientation of magnetic particles also gives higher signal-to-noise ratio;<br />

however, the requirement for thermal stability over periods of years dictates a lower limit to the size of<br />

magnetic particles in a magnetic domain because ambient thermal energy causes the magnetic signals to<br />

decay. Achieving both small particle size and thermal stability over time can be done by using magnetic<br />

materials with higher coercivity, but there is a strong practical upper limit to the coercivity that can be<br />

written, and it is determined by the saturation magnetization of the head material.<br />

In addition to the basic physics, a number of practical engineering factors must be considered at extremely<br />

high densities. In particular, these factors include the ability to manufacture accurately the desired head<br />

geometries and control media thickness, the ability to closely follow the written tracks, to control head<br />

flying height, and the ability to maintain a very small, stable magnetic separation.<br />

The Future<br />

The hard drive areal densities have grown at an annual rate approaching 100%. Recently a 20 Gbit/in. 2 has<br />

been demonstrated [5], and some theoretical indications of feasibility of extremely high densities approaching<br />

1 Tbit/in. 2 have been given [8,9]. Although the consideration related to user needs including higher<br />

capacity, speed, error performance, reliability, environment condition tolerances, etc. are important, the<br />

factors affecting cost tend to dominate read channel architecture and design considerations. Thus, achieving<br />

highest recording density with lowest component costs at high manufacturing yields is the ultimate goal.<br />

With areal densities growing at an annual rate approaching 100%, real concern continues to be<br />

expressed that we may be approaching a limit to conventional magnetic recording technology; however,<br />

as long as the read channel is concerned, large opportunities are available to improve on the existing<br />

signal processing, both with detectors better matched to the channel and by applying more advanced<br />

detection, modulation, and coding schemes.<br />

© 2002 by CRC Press LLC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!