15.01.2013 Views

U. Glaeser

U. Glaeser

U. Glaeser

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A more severe limit on the loop bandwidth beyond a decade below the reference frequency can result<br />

in both PLLs and DLLs if there is considerable delay in the feedback path. The decade limit is based on<br />

the phase detector adding one reference period delay in the feedback path since it only samples clock<br />

edges once per reference cycle. This single reference period delay leads to an effective pole near the<br />

reference frequency. The loop bandwidth must be at least a decade below this pole to not affect stability.<br />

This bandwidth limit can be further reduced if extra delay is added in the feedback path, by an amount<br />

proportional to one plus the number of reference periods additional delay.<br />

DLL/PLL Circuits<br />

Prior sections discussed design issues related to DLL and PLL loop architectures and low output jitter.<br />

With these issues in mind, this section discusses the circuit level implementation issues of the loop<br />

components. These components include the VCDL and VCO, phase detector, charge pump, and loop filter.<br />

VCDLs and VCOs<br />

The VDCL and VCO are the most critical parts of DLL and PLL designs for achieving low output jitter<br />

and good overall performance. Two general types of VCDLs are used with analog control. First, a VDCL<br />

can interpolate between two delays through an analog weighted sum circuit. This approach only leads<br />

to linear control over delay, if the two interpolated delays are relatively close, which restricts the overall<br />

range of the VCDL. Second, a VCDL can be based on an analog delay line composed of identical cascaded<br />

delay elements, each with a delay that is controlled by an analog signal. This approach usually leads to<br />

a wide delay range with nonlinear delay control. A wide delay range is often desired in order to handle<br />

a range of operating frequencies and process and environmental variability. However, nonlinear delay<br />

control can restrict the usable delay range due to undesirable loop dynamics.<br />

Several types of VCOs are used. First, a VCO can be based on an LC tank circuit. This type of oscillator<br />

has very high supply noise rejection and low phase noise output characteristics. However, it usually also<br />

has a restricted tuning range, which makes it impractical for digital ICs. Second, a VCO can be based on<br />

a relaxation oscillator. The frequency in this circuit is typically established by the rate a capacitor can be<br />

charged and discharged over some established voltage range with an adjustable current. This approach<br />

typically requires too much supply headroom to achieve good supply noise rejection and can be extra<br />

sensitive to sudden changes in the supply voltage. Third, and most popular for digital ICs, a VCO can be<br />

based on a phase shift oscillator, also known as a ring oscillator. A ring oscillator is a ring of identical<br />

cascaded delay elements with inverting feedback between the two elements that close the ring. A ring<br />

oscillator can typically generate frequencies over a wide range with linear control over frequency.<br />

The delay elements, also known as buffer stages, used in a delay line or ring oscillator can be singleended,<br />

such that they have only one input and one output and invert the signal, or differential, such they<br />

have two complementary inputs and outputs. Single-ended delay elements typically lead to reduced area<br />

and power, but provide no complementary outputs. Complementary outputs provide twice as many output<br />

signals with phases that span the output period compared to single-ended outputs, and allow a 50% duty<br />

cycle signal to be cleanly generated without dividing the output frequency by two. Differential delay elements<br />

typically have reduced dynamic noise coupling to their outputs and provide complementary outputs.<br />

A number of factors must be considered in the design of the delay elements. The delay of the delay<br />

elements should have a linear dependence on control voltage when used in a VCDL and an inverse linear<br />

dependence on control voltage when used in a VCO. These control relationships will make the VCDL<br />

and VCO control gains constant and independent of the operating frequency, which will lead to operating<br />

frequency independent loop dynamics. The static supply and substrate noise sensitivity should be as<br />

small as possible, ideally less than 1% delay sensitivity per fraction of the total supply voltage change. As<br />

previously discussed, this reduced level of supply sensitivity can be established with current source<br />

isolation.<br />

Figure 10.19 shows a single-ended delay element circuit for an N-well CMOS process. This circuit contains<br />

a PMOS common-source device with a PMOS diode clamp and a simple NMOS current source. The diode<br />

clamp restricts the buffer output swing in order to keep the NMOS current source device in saturation.<br />

© 2002 by CRC Press LLC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!