15.01.2013 Views

U. Glaeser

U. Glaeser

U. Glaeser

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The static components relate to the sensitivity to the DC value of the supply or substrate voltage. The static<br />

noise sensitivity can predict the noise response for all but the high-frequency components of the supply and<br />

substrate noise. The dynamic components relate to the extra sensitivity to a sudden change in the supply or<br />

substrate voltage that the static components do not predict. The effect of the dynamic components increases<br />

with increasing noise edge rate. For PLLs, the dynamic noise sensitivity typically has a much smaller overall<br />

impact on the supply and substrate noise response than the static noise sensitivity; however, for DLLs, the<br />

dynamic noise sensitivity can be more significant than static noise sensitivity. Only static supply and substrate<br />

noise sensitivity are considered in this chapter.<br />

Minimizing Supply Noise Sensitivity<br />

All VCDL and VCO circuits will have some inherent sensitivity to supply noise. In general, supply noise<br />

sensitivity can be minimized by isolating the delay elements used within the VCDL or VCO from one of<br />

the supply terminals. This goal can be accomplished by using a buffered version of the control voltage<br />

as one of the supply terminals; however, this technique can require too much supply voltage headroom.<br />

The preferred and most common approach is to use the control voltage to generate a supply independent<br />

bias current so that current sources with this bias current can be used to isolate the delay elements from<br />

the opposite supply.<br />

Supply voltage sensitivity is directly proportional to current source output conductance. Simple current<br />

sources provide a delay sensitivity per fraction of the total supply voltage change ((dt/t)/(dVDD/VDD)), of<br />

about 10%, such that if the supply voltage changed by 10% the delay would change by 1%. This level of<br />

delay sensitivity is too large for good jitter performance in PLLs. Cascode current sources provide an<br />

equivalent delay sensitivity of about 1%, such that if the supply voltage changed by 10% the delay would<br />

change by 0.1%, which is at the level needed for good jitter performance, but cascode current sources can<br />

require too much supply voltage headroom. Another technique that can also offer an equivalent delay<br />

sensitivity of about 1% is replica current source biasing [9]. In this approach, the bias voltage for simple<br />

current sources is actively adjusted by an amplifier in a feedback configuration to keep some property of<br />

the delay element, such as voltage swing, constant and possibly equal to the control voltage.<br />

Once adequate measures are taken to minimize the current source output conductance, other supply<br />

voltage dependencies may begin to dominate the overall supply voltage sensitivity of the delay elements.<br />

These effects include the dependencies of threshold voltage and diffusion capacitance for switching<br />

devices on the source or drain voltages, which can be modulated by the supply voltage. With any supply<br />

terminal isolation technique, all internal switching nodes will have voltages that track the supply terminal<br />

opposite to the one isolated. Thus, these effects can be manifested by devices with bulk terminals<br />

connected to the isolated supply terminal. These effects are always a problem for substrate devices with<br />

an isolated substrate-tap voltage supply terminal, such as for NMOS devices in an N-well process with<br />

an isolated negative supply terminal. Isolating the well-tap voltage supply terminal avoids this problem<br />

since the bulk terminals of the well devices can be connected to their source terminals, such as with<br />

PMOS devices in an N-well process with an isolated positive supply terminal. However, such an approach<br />

leads to more significant substrate noise problems. The only real solution is to minimize their occurrence<br />

and to minimize their switching diffusion capacitance. Typically, these effects will establish a minimum<br />

delay sensitivity per fraction of the total supply voltage change of about 1%.<br />

Supply Noise Filters<br />

Another technique to minimize supply noise is to employ supply filters. Supply filters can be both passive,<br />

active, or a combination of the two. Passive supply filters are basically low-pass filters. Off-chip passive filters<br />

work very well in filtering out most off-chip noise but do little to filter out on-chip noise. Unfortunately,<br />

on-chip filters can have difficulty in filtering out low-frequency on-chip noise. Off-chip capacitors can easily<br />

be made large enough to filter out low-frequency noise, but on-chip capacitors are much more limited in<br />

size. In order for the filter to be effective in reducing jitter for both DLLs and PLLs, the filter cutoff frequency<br />

must be below the loop bandwidth.<br />

© 2002 by CRC Press LLC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!