28.04.2013 Views

Redes Modalidad 1.pdf - RUA - Universidad de Alicante

Redes Modalidad 1.pdf - RUA - Universidad de Alicante

Redes Modalidad 1.pdf - RUA - Universidad de Alicante

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ANEXO I<br />

Póster presentado por la presente Red Docente en el congreso “Euroanalysis XIII”<br />

celebrado en Salamanca en Septiembre <strong>de</strong> 2004.<br />

Implementation of the European Credit Transfer<br />

System in Analytical Chemistry experimental<br />

subjects<br />

Luis Gras, Guillermo Grindlay, Alfonso Jiménez, Salvador Maestre, Juan Mora, Soledad Prats, José L. Todolí<br />

Department of Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of <strong>Alicante</strong>, P.O. Box 99,<br />

03080 <strong>Alicante</strong>, Spain<br />

Currently, there are two experimental subjects in the Spanish Curriculum of the Chemistry Degree related with Analytical Chemistry: (i) Introduction to<br />

Chemical Experimentation and to Analytical Instrumentation, first year; and, (ii) Experimentation in Analytical Chemistry, fourth year.<br />

The present investigation has been focused on the study of the suitability of the teaching methodology employed in both subjects to the European Credit<br />

Transfer System (ECTS).<br />

An important point of the learning process is the vocation of the stu<strong>de</strong>nts. In the case of the first subject, we have found a direct correlation between it<br />

and the success yield of the stu<strong>de</strong>nts (see Figure 1). Each point in Figure 1 corresponds to a season (from 1995/96 to 2003/2004). It can be observed that the<br />

vocation clearly affects to the percentage of stu<strong>de</strong>nts that succee<strong>de</strong>d the subject (i). The result found for season 1995/96 could be attributed to the teaching<br />

methodology used during this season.<br />

As regards the second subject, different teaching methodologies have been applied (Figure 2). The current method is based on three principal activities:<br />

(a) Bibliographic search. This work is carried out by the stu<strong>de</strong>nts in an in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt fashion and<br />

the professor simply gives some gui<strong>de</strong>lines in or<strong>de</strong>r the stu<strong>de</strong>nts to find the sought information;<br />

(b) Practical work in the laboratory. In this case, the stu<strong>de</strong>nts have a script that indicates the<br />

most salient points of the experiment to carry out; and,<br />

(c) Elaboration of reports in which the stu<strong>de</strong>nts summarize the results together with brief<br />

discussions about the findings.<br />

In or<strong>de</strong>r to evaluate the second subject several opinion pools (qualitative and quantitative) have been distributed to the stu<strong>de</strong>nts consi<strong>de</strong>ring the three main points<br />

of this subject. The goal of this part of the study is to know whether the stu<strong>de</strong>nts appreciate the objectives of the present methodology (marked in red) or not.<br />

75%<br />

50%<br />

Explanation Experiment 1<br />

Explanation Experiment 2<br />

Explanation Experiment 3<br />

Explanation Experiment 4<br />

14%<br />

1 hour an<br />

explanation<br />

25%<br />

36%<br />

3-6 hours an<br />

experiment<br />

Laboratory<br />

Notebook<br />

Figure 5. Yield reached as regards the bibliographic search.<br />

Number of answers: 14<br />

Positive comments<br />

The information is reached in an autonomous way<br />

Very useful information is found<br />

Better un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of the sources of information<br />

Information is shared and exchanged among the stu<strong>de</strong>nts<br />

New applications of the experiments to the real life are found<br />

Negative comments<br />

Sometimes more information than that found is required by the<br />

stu<strong>de</strong>nts.<br />

Exam<br />

79%<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

29%<br />

Problems with<br />

instrumentation<br />

50%<br />

21%<br />

Lack of available<br />

material<br />

21%<br />

Explanation<br />

2 hours<br />

Lack of information in<br />

the sript<br />

Lack of time<br />

Bibliographic<br />

search<br />

Experiment 1<br />

Experiment 2<br />

Experiment 3<br />

Experiment 4<br />

3-6 hours an<br />

experiment<br />

Figure 2. Differences between the method initially employed and the one currently used in “Experimentation in Analytical Chemistry”<br />

% stu<strong>de</strong>nts that succee<strong>de</strong>d<br />

subject (i)<br />

93%<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

50%<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Figure 1<br />

season 1995/96<br />

(old methodology)<br />

50 60 70 80 90<br />

What points must<br />

be introduced?<br />

% stu<strong>de</strong>nts actually willing to study chemistry<br />

7%<br />

Lack of computers A lot of work to do Lack of time<br />

in the lab.<br />

Figure 8. Difficulties found by the stu<strong>de</strong>nts in the<br />

Preparation of the report. Number of answers: 14<br />

7%<br />

7%<br />

Reports Exam<br />

Bibliographic search Practical work in the laboratory Report of results<br />

Number of answers<br />

Number of answers<br />

Number of answers<br />

Number of answers<br />

Number of answers<br />

Number of answers<br />

Number of answers<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Few books Lack of<br />

additional<br />

titles<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Difficulty <strong>de</strong>gree<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Difficulty <strong>de</strong>gree<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Difficulty <strong>de</strong>gree<br />

Books are<br />

written in<br />

english<br />

Difficulties<br />

No difficulties<br />

Books are too Lack of time<br />

general<br />

Figure 3. Difficulties found by the stu<strong>de</strong>nts in the<br />

bibliographic search. Number of answers: 14<br />

Search in the laboratory<br />

Number of answers: 45<br />

Search in the library<br />

Number of answers: 42<br />

Search in Internet<br />

Number of answers: 33<br />

Figure 4. Difficulty <strong>de</strong>gree found by the stu<strong>de</strong>nts in the<br />

three aspects of bibliographic search. 1: No difficult; 5:<br />

Very difficult.<br />

Good<br />

Bad<br />

No answer<br />

Number of answers<br />

Difficulties<br />

No difficulties<br />

Figure 6. Difficulties found by the stu<strong>de</strong>nts in the<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopment of experiments. Number of answers: 13<br />

Good<br />

Bad<br />

No answer<br />

Figure 7. Yield reached as regards the practical work in the<br />

Laboratory. Number of answers: 10<br />

Positive comments<br />

Cooperative work in group is promoted.<br />

Stu<strong>de</strong>nts learn how to work in the laboratory in an<br />

autonomous way.<br />

New laboratory skills are acquired.<br />

Negative comments<br />

Sometimes the stu<strong>de</strong>nts do not know what they have<br />

done.<br />

There is a lack of time and the experiments are<br />

carried out too fast.<br />

Further orientation is required from the professor.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Bibliographic<br />

search<br />

Bibliographic<br />

search<br />

Bibliographic<br />

search<br />

Vocational stu<strong>de</strong>nts will warranty the success of the ETCS.<br />

Teaching methods might be based on autonomous and<br />

cooperative work.<br />

With teaching method proposed, the stu<strong>de</strong>nts found important<br />

difficulties, although they finally accomplished the learning<br />

objectives.<br />

7%<br />

43%<br />

86%<br />

Difficulties<br />

No difficulties<br />

Good<br />

Bad<br />

No answer<br />

Figure 9. Yield reached as regards the preparation of the<br />

report. Number of answers: 13<br />

Positive comments<br />

Is the most important part of the subject<br />

New concepts are learned<br />

The cooperative work is favored<br />

Negative comments<br />

The reports must be better revised by the professor<br />

Additional time is required to prepare them correctly<br />

Positive<br />

Negative<br />

No answer<br />

Despite its difficulties, the teaching method presented is<br />

Figure 10. Final assessment of the stu<strong>de</strong>nts as regards<br />

suitable for its use in the forthcoming ECTS.<br />

the teaching method followed for the present subject<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

The authors are grateful to the Instituto <strong>de</strong> Ciencias <strong>de</strong> la Educación (ICE) of the University of <strong>Alicante</strong> for the financial support of the<br />

present study<br />

72<br />

Number of answers

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!