04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

108 ETHICS AND POLITICS: <strong>THE</strong> GREEKS<br />

Since the notion of ought is essential to morality, the<br />

so th<strong>at</strong><br />

conception of free will is also essential to morality,<br />

if a man is not responsible for his actions, he cannot be<br />

considered a moral agent. If, therefore, Aristotle's ordinary<br />

man is not to be regarded merely as a well-trained auto-<br />

m<strong>at</strong>on performing, as an ant performs, those actions which<br />

are necessary to the well-being of the community to which<br />

he belongs, if he is to be regarded as a moral agent able<br />

freely to choose wh<strong>at</strong> is right and to act in accordance<br />

with his choice, it is essential th<strong>at</strong> he should be credited<br />

with free will. Now to establish the existence of free will<br />

is an exceedingly difficult undertaking, for once you begin<br />

to think about free will, you are apt to find, as I shall<br />

try l<strong>at</strong>er to show, 1 th<strong>at</strong> all the arguments th<strong>at</strong> occur to<br />

you on the subject are arguments against it. Freedom may<br />

be a fact and we may be convinced th<strong>at</strong> it is a fact, but,<br />

if so, it is a fact which must be approached only with<br />

the gre<strong>at</strong>est circumspection; th<strong>at</strong> is why arguments<br />

between determinists and upholders of freedom almost<br />

invariably end in favour of the former. How various and<br />

how formidable are the arguments which may be brought<br />

against the conception of freedom I shall hope to show in<br />

Chapter VII. For the present, we are concerned only<br />

with Aristotle's tre<strong>at</strong>ment of the subject.<br />

Wh<strong>at</strong> Constitutes an Action ? Aristotle propounds a<br />

doctrine which purports to claim freedom for the human<br />

will, and which he officially regards as establishing the<br />

claim. Aristotle, in fact, shares the plain man's conviction<br />

of freedom, but it may be doubted whether he has been<br />

any more successful in substanti<strong>at</strong>ing it than other philosophers<br />

who have <strong>at</strong>tempted the task. Aristotle begins by<br />

pointing out th<strong>at</strong>, when we judge men from the moral<br />

point of view, assigning to them moral praise or blame, it<br />

is not so much about their actions th<strong>at</strong> we are judging<br />

as about the will, or intention, from which their actions<br />

spring. An action is, after all, only the displacement of<br />

1 See Chapter VII, pp. 228-245.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!