04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>THE</strong> PROBLEM Of PREE WILL 041<br />

thwarting we demand compens<strong>at</strong>ion, or instinctive inferior-<br />

itiei and deficiencies, our realiz<strong>at</strong>ion of which leads us to<br />

demand TTfltiiirflnrf*.<br />

If this view of reason is right, the belief in the freedom of<br />

the will must be abandoned. For, if the faculty which is<br />

involved in moral judgment and choice is fundamentally<br />

non-r<strong>at</strong>ional, then it is not freely exercised; if feeling<br />

alone can motiv<strong>at</strong>e to action, then action is never freely<br />

chosen; if the conclusions of the reason never afford a<br />

sufficient ground for conduct, then conduct is always<br />

determined by non-r<strong>at</strong>ional factors.<br />

Self-Determinism L<strong>at</strong>ent in Many Philosophies.<br />

Now many philosophers have adopted views which entail<br />

th<strong>at</strong> the forces which motiv<strong>at</strong>e human beings to action<br />

are non-r<strong>at</strong>ional, even when they have repudi<strong>at</strong>ed the<br />

determinist implic<strong>at</strong>ions which, if I am right, follow from<br />

these views. Aristotle, for example, as I mentioned in an<br />

earlier chapter, 1 announces th<strong>at</strong> thought itself cannot<br />

motiv<strong>at</strong>e movement, and, although he goes on to qualify<br />

the st<strong>at</strong>ement and suggests th<strong>at</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> he calls practical<br />

thought, practical, th<strong>at</strong> is, as opposed to theoretical or<br />

specul<strong>at</strong>ive thought, may motiv<strong>at</strong>e to action, his doctrine<br />

of the will certainly lends itself to the view th<strong>at</strong> it is not<br />

reason but desire th<strong>at</strong> determines our actions. 1 Philoso-<br />

phers have used ambiguous phrases such as " r<strong>at</strong>ional<br />

desire" to suggest th<strong>at</strong>, when we will to act in a certain way,<br />

or endeavour to obtain certain ends, the elements in our<br />

n<strong>at</strong>ure engaged in mqlnng the choice or pursuing the<br />

endeavour are not necessarily irr<strong>at</strong>ional, even though they<br />

are essentially emotional or desiring dements. The only<br />

meaning th<strong>at</strong> it is possible to extract from such phrases is<br />

th<strong>at</strong>, while the emotional or desiring parts of our n<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

determine our actions, they may on occasion oper<strong>at</strong>e in<br />

accordance with the dict<strong>at</strong>es of reason, and so deserve the<br />

title of r<strong>at</strong>ional. The philosopher, T. H. Gfeen (1836-<br />

1882), for example, speaks of our desiring or appetitive<br />

1 Scc Chapter IV, p. no. 'See Chapter IV, pp. us, 113.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!