04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SOVEREIGNTY AND NATURAL RIGHTS 515<br />

legisl<strong>at</strong>ure or judic<strong>at</strong>ure. Subsequent<br />

critics have found<br />

difficulty in believing th<strong>at</strong> Rousseau meant wh<strong>at</strong> he said;<br />

difficulty, th<strong>at</strong> is to say, in crediting the fact th<strong>at</strong> he really<br />

envisaged Sovereignty as belonging to the assembly of the<br />

whole people. But when it is borne in mind th<strong>at</strong> Rousseau<br />

was thinking of a community not larger than a Greek<br />

City St<strong>at</strong>e,<br />

more than<br />

a community, th<strong>at</strong> is<br />

100,000 adult citizens<br />

to say, in which not<br />

<strong>at</strong> most were entitled<br />

to vote, there is nothing particularly outrageous about<br />

his view. It does, however, give rise to a problem which<br />

becomes acute, so soon as we are concerned with a com-<br />

munity larger than the Greek City St<strong>at</strong>e. If we take the<br />

view th<strong>at</strong> it is with the people as a whole, or <strong>at</strong> any r<strong>at</strong>e<br />

with the majority of the people, th<strong>at</strong> power in a com-<br />

munity resides, or ought to reside, how, it may be asked,<br />

is this power to be exercised or made effective in the<br />

modern v n<strong>at</strong>ion-st<strong>at</strong>e, \vhere the majority of the people are<br />

too numerous to form a practicable legisl<strong>at</strong>ive body?<br />

Political Proposals of Bentham. This is one of the<br />

problems with which Jeremy Bentham concerns himself<br />

in his Fragment on Government. Bentham followed Locke<br />

in holding th<strong>at</strong> the majority in a community should<br />

decide. To him it seemed self-evident th<strong>at</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> the majority<br />

wanted would be, if not "right" a word which, as we<br />

have seen, had no unique meaning for Bentham 1 <strong>at</strong> least<br />

conducive to the general happiness. But, more plainly<br />

than Locke, Bentham discerned the problem which, in a<br />

large community, the demand for represent<strong>at</strong>ive government<br />

presented. For in a large community the majority<br />

must, it is obvious, express its wishes through representa-<br />

tives. These would in accordance with Bentham's psychological<br />

views, 1 be guided by self-interest, albeit enlightened<br />

self-interest. How, then, were they to be induced<br />

to act in such a way as to carry out the wishes of the<br />

majority, th<strong>at</strong> is to say, to promote the gre<strong>at</strong>est happiness<br />

of the gre<strong>at</strong>est number?<br />

1 See Chapter IX, pp. 395-327.<br />

' See Chapter IX, pp. 398, 329^

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!