04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>THE</strong> SCOPE OP ETHICS 147<br />

Difficulty of Ethical Questions. They are, it is obvious,<br />

exceedingly difficult to answer; so difficult, th<strong>at</strong> it seems<br />

improbable th<strong>at</strong> they will ever be answered in a manner<br />

which commands universal assent. It is certainly the case<br />

th<strong>at</strong> up to the present no agreed answers have been pro-<br />

pounded. If they had, human life would be a simpler<br />

affair than it is.<br />

A number of obvious difficulties immedi<strong>at</strong>ely suggest<br />

themselves.<br />

(x) THAT IT is NOT POSSIBLE <strong>TO</strong> PROVE ETHICAL PRO-<br />

POSITIONS. There is the difficulty of giving any answer<br />

to an ethical question which can be proved to be true to<br />

those who challenge it. In this respect ethics is <strong>at</strong> a dis-<br />

advantage as compared with m<strong>at</strong>hem<strong>at</strong>ics or with science.<br />

A m<strong>at</strong>hem<strong>at</strong>ical st<strong>at</strong>ement which is true can be proved<br />

to be so to anyone who has sufficient intelligence to grasp<br />

the proof. Thus, if I assert th<strong>at</strong> any two sides of a triangle<br />

are gre<strong>at</strong>er than a third, or th<strong>at</strong> a 1 -b l<br />

=(a+b)(a~b), I<br />

should expect to be able 'to show th<strong>at</strong> my assertion was<br />

true, aild also why it was true, to anyone who possessed<br />

normal intelligence. If, supposing th<strong>at</strong> my demonstr<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

were both clear and correct, I found <strong>at</strong> the end th<strong>at</strong> I<br />

had failed to convince him, I should judge th<strong>at</strong> his intelligence<br />

was not such as is proper to, or customary among,<br />

adult human beings. It is, of course, true th<strong>at</strong> my demonstr<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

would entail the acceptance of certain undemon-<br />

strable principles.<br />

It would entail, for example, acceptance<br />

of the laws of logic and of the processes of inference<br />

and deduction, the truth and legitimacy of which are<br />

intuitively perceived. 1 But the acceptance of these laws,<br />

the performance of these processes, are common to all<br />

normally intelligent human beings. Similarly with science;<br />

if I wish to show th<strong>at</strong> HO is the chemical formula for<br />

w<strong>at</strong>er, I have only to associ<strong>at</strong>e two parts of hydrogen and<br />

one of oxygen, to demonstr<strong>at</strong>e to anybody who cares to<br />

1 See my Gbufr to Philosophy, Chapter V, for an account ofundemonstrabk<br />

logical law.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!