04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OBJECTIVE INTUITIONISM ail<br />

a little strangely to modern ears. Nevertheless, his position<br />

has considerable force. This is due to its undoubted success in<br />

providing an understandable account of the significance of<br />

the word "ought", and a reasonable explan<strong>at</strong>ion of the<br />

feeling of moral oblig<strong>at</strong>ion for which the word "ought"<br />

stands. "I want to do this"; "I have a strong tempt<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

to do this"; "I shall grow rich, powerful or popular by<br />

doing this"; "I shall be happy if I do this"; "I shall 'get<br />

away with it' if I do this" none of these st<strong>at</strong>ements<br />

needs to be explained to us before we .can understand<br />

its significance. But when we proceed to add, "Nevertheless,<br />

I ought to do th<strong>at</strong>", the position is different. Some<br />

explan<strong>at</strong>ion of the word "ought" is, it is obvious, required.<br />

Nor is it readily forthcoming. Examine the world around<br />

us, explore physical n<strong>at</strong>ure, analyse and describe human<br />

society, and you will accumul<strong>at</strong>e inform<strong>at</strong>ion about wh<strong>at</strong><br />

is; you will, in short, ascertain facts. But you will not discover<br />

wh<strong>at</strong> should be; the inform<strong>at</strong>ion th<strong>at</strong> you obtain<br />

will not include "oughts". The most elabor<strong>at</strong>e examin<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

of fact will not be found to yield a single "ought". Whence,<br />

then, do "oughts" derive? Kant's explan<strong>at</strong>ion is th<strong>at</strong><br />

they arise, or r<strong>at</strong>her th<strong>at</strong> the recognition of them arises<br />

in a part of our being by virtue of which we particip<strong>at</strong>e<br />

in a world other than the world of fact, in the everyday<br />

sense of the word "fact". The notion of moral oblig<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

comes to us, in other words, from reality, and in and<br />

through it alone do we make contact with reality. This<br />

explan<strong>at</strong>ion covers very s<strong>at</strong>isfactorily the moral experience<br />

of simple and uninstructed persons. For this, as I pointed<br />

out above, 1 often expresses itself in judgments which<br />

possess a directness and authority lacking in those of more<br />

which leads<br />

sophistic<strong>at</strong>ed people. The moral experience<br />

them to pass these judgments is, it is obvious, fresh and<br />

vivid. Since we are unable to trace the source of these<br />

judgments to reflection upon the principles of conduct,<br />

or estim<strong>at</strong>es of social consequence*, it seems reasonable<br />

to regard the .experience which gives rise to them and the<br />

1 Sec pp. 176, 177.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!