04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8OGIETY. ITS NATURE AND ORIGIN 497<br />

which all citizens are members of the legisl<strong>at</strong>ive assembly,<br />

But even in an extreme democracy there may be a more 01<br />

less permanent majority which overrides the wishes oi<br />

the more or less permanent minority. Can it, then, be said<br />

of members of the minority "they all gain exactly as much<br />

as they lose", or gain as much as members of the majority,<br />

as a result of the contract to live in society? Prima facu<br />

they do not, and it is to meet this difficulty th<strong>at</strong> Rousseau<br />

puts forward his doctrine of the General Will. This he<br />

st<strong>at</strong>es as follows: "Each of us puts his person and all hi*<br />

power tinder the supreme direction of the general will. . .<br />

The act of associ<strong>at</strong>ion instantaneously substitutes for the<br />

particular personality of each contractor a moral and<br />

collective body . . . which by this very act receives ifc<br />

unity, its common self, its life and its will."<br />

Granted the existence of this General Will, we are asked<br />

to believe th<strong>at</strong> a law-abiding minority obeys not merely the<br />

will of the particular majority which happens <strong>at</strong> the moment<br />

to be determining the laws and policy of the St<strong>at</strong>e, but<br />

also its own will, in so far as its own will is "general".<br />

Elabor<strong>at</strong>ion of the Doctrine of the General Will<br />

Rousseau's account of this General Will,<br />

the will of each citizen, is far from clear.<br />

following st<strong>at</strong>ements about it:<br />

which is alsc<br />

He makes the<br />

(1) Since it is a will for the common and not for an)<br />

sectional interest, it is always right in the sense th<strong>at</strong> it ii<br />

always disinterested. "Why," he asks, "is the general wil<br />

always right, and why do all invariably will the happiness<br />

of each? Because the general will, if it is to deserve the<br />

name, must be general in its object as well aa in itsj<br />

it must come from all and apply to all."<br />

General Will always right, but there are ap<br />

of generality and, therefore, of right<br />

general will is always the most just, andjKheS^ice of the<br />

people is, in fact, the voice of God."<br />

(2) Since in regard to every question<br />

St<strong>at</strong>e there is always a disinterested

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!