04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CRITICISM 07 IDEALIST <strong>THE</strong>ORY 749<br />

provides th<strong>at</strong> the units of the armed forces shall elect<br />

councils to express their wishes and to w<strong>at</strong>ch over their<br />

interests. These directly elected councils deal with all<br />

m<strong>at</strong>ters appertaining to the welfare of the unit which elects<br />

them, concerning themselves with questions of pay and of<br />

hours, with the quality of work performed, with dur<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

and d<strong>at</strong>es of holidays, with pensions on retirement through<br />

old age or injury. They also elect deleg<strong>at</strong>es to other<br />

councils, which are in effect feder<strong>at</strong>ions of functional<br />

councils, and exercise jurisdiction over a whole town or<br />

region. The feder<strong>at</strong>ing regional councils elect deleg<strong>at</strong>es<br />

to a supreme council, the All-Russia Congress of Soviets,<br />

in which Sovereignty resides. The executive committee<br />

of the All-Russia Congress of Soviets is elected by the<br />

Congress to carry on the actual business of government,<br />

and appoints individuals from among its members, the<br />

Russian Commissars, to take charge of the various adminis-<br />

tr<strong>at</strong>ive departments.<br />

This brief sketch of the machinery of Soviet democracy<br />

has been inserted here as evidence of the fact th<strong>at</strong> systems<br />

of democracy based not upon geographical constituency<br />

units, but upon functional organiz<strong>at</strong>ions, are not only<br />

possible, but are actually <strong>at</strong> work. I am not concerned<br />

here th<strong>at</strong> systems of represent<strong>at</strong>ion based upon<br />

community of occup<strong>at</strong>ion are either superior or inferior<br />

to those which embody the principle of proximity of residence.<br />

It is sufficient for the purpose of the discussion<br />

to point out th<strong>at</strong> they are different. Their difference<br />

derives from the recognition th<strong>at</strong> common interests, based<br />

upon economic solidarity and functional associ<strong>at</strong>ion, constitute<br />

a p<strong>at</strong>tern of organiz<strong>at</strong>ion which is <strong>at</strong> least as valuable<br />

as, if not more valuable than, the p<strong>at</strong>tern which<br />

results from common interests based upon geographical<br />

proximity. It is a difference which points once again to<br />

the conclusion already reached, th<strong>at</strong> there is no ground for<br />

accepting a division of mankind into N<strong>at</strong>ion-St<strong>at</strong>es whose<br />

members are organized upon the basis of territorial pro-<br />

pinquity as being either final or absolute. Moreover, it is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!