04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

54 ETHICS AND POLITICS: <strong>THE</strong> GREEKS<br />

a sufficiently acute political insight, be able to divine the<br />

ground plan from die acts.<br />

Now in this case it is, I think, obvious th<strong>at</strong> the appro*<br />

pri<strong>at</strong>c conception is not th<strong>at</strong> of "parts" coming together<br />

to form a whole, but th<strong>at</strong> of a whole or unity, a ground<br />

plan, as I have called it, which expresses itself in a variety<br />

of aspects. It is of this conception th<strong>at</strong> Pl<strong>at</strong>o's theory of the<br />

soul makes use. The soul, he holds, is fundamentally a<br />

unity, but it is a unity which expresses itself in a variety<br />

of aspects or, as we should now say, a unity which exhibits<br />

a plurality of functions. The soul is, therefore, to use his<br />

own expression, neither a One, as Socr<strong>at</strong>es had seemed to<br />

suggest, nor just an uncoordin<strong>at</strong>ed Many, but a One and a<br />

Many, or a One which expresses itself in Many aspects.<br />

Pl<strong>at</strong>o's Division of the Soul* Of these many aspects,<br />

Pl<strong>at</strong>o distinguishes three. There is the reasoning "part" or<br />

aspect; the "part" which is made up of the higher and<br />

nobler emotions; and the "part" which is made up of<br />

the appetites and passions.<br />

The differenti<strong>at</strong>ion of the soul into these three "parts"<br />

for the sake ofconvenience I propose to use the traditional<br />

of the<br />

expression is effected by the simple applic<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

law of contradiction. There is, Pl<strong>at</strong>o points out, a contra-<br />

diction between the course of action which we know to<br />

be right or good, and the courses which appetite demands<br />

or passion inspires. Th<strong>at</strong> which knows course X to be right<br />

and good cannot, therefore, be the same as th<strong>at</strong> which<br />

inclines us to course Y. The reasoning part of the soul<br />

which, as Socr<strong>at</strong>es would say, knows and desires to pursue<br />

the Good cannot, in other words, be the same as the<br />

purely appetitive part which is concerned its own s<strong>at</strong>isfaction.<br />

only to secure<br />

Now in different people different parts of the soul<br />

predomin<strong>at</strong>e, and the general character of an individual's<br />

conduct will be determined by the activity of<br />

the predomin<strong>at</strong>ing part. Individuals may, therefore, be<br />

alloc<strong>at</strong>ed to one or other of three c<strong>at</strong>egories, the alloc<strong>at</strong>ion

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!