04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

230<br />

ETHICS<br />

th<strong>at</strong> ii to say, not to have them, lincc they are die effects<br />

of occurrence! in my body. If, however, the body does<br />

not interact with die mind, then it it difficult to explain<br />

the apparent parallelism between the two, a parallelism<br />

which is illustr<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong> alnfixt every moment of our waking<br />

life* For example, when I feel hungry and see food, my<br />

salivary glands secrete fluid, and when the food is put<br />

before me my hands make the necessary movements to<br />

convey it into a hole which opens in the bottom of my<br />

face. It is difficult to account for this synchronis<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

between mental desire and bodily movements, unless we<br />

assume th<strong>at</strong> the mind and body interact. But how, it may<br />

be asked, can th<strong>at</strong> which is m<strong>at</strong>erial interact with, and<br />

produce effects upon, th<strong>at</strong> which is not? How, for example,<br />

can a sledge-hammer break * wish, or a steam roller<br />

fl<strong>at</strong>ten the inspir<strong>at</strong>ion which produced Beethoven's Fifth<br />

Symphony? Or 'how, to take an instance which is relevant<br />

to our present discussion, can the secretion of adrenalin<br />

by a gland cause me to feel afraid, if my feeling<br />

of fear is<br />

an exclusively non-m<strong>at</strong>erial event? Things, it may be said,<br />

can only "get <strong>at</strong>" one another in virtue of their possession<br />

of certain properties in common, but between a m<strong>at</strong>erial<br />

and an imm<strong>at</strong>erial entity there are no properties in<br />

common. Therefore they cannot interact with each other.<br />

Yet, as we have seen, mind and body do palpably interact.<br />

The mind then, it is argued, cannot be wholly other than<br />

the body. It too must be m<strong>at</strong>erial, or must be <strong>at</strong> least<br />

an eman<strong>at</strong>ion from or a function of th<strong>at</strong> which is m<strong>at</strong>erial,<br />

namely, of those occurrencies which take place in the body.<br />

Now these, as we have seen, are caused events, each of<br />

which is the effect of a preceding bodily event, the first<br />

bodily event in this chain of earned bodily events being<br />

the determined effect of an external stimulus to which the<br />

body is exposed and to which it reacts. Wh<strong>at</strong> are called<br />

mental events are, the m<strong>at</strong>erialist argues, links in the same<br />

chain of caused events, and are dependent upon the<br />

movements in the nerves and the brain which cause them<br />

to happen. Acts of will are mental events: therefore acti of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!