04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OBJECTIVE INTUITIONISM 221<br />

avoids doing wrong; he is r<strong>at</strong>her one who, because of the<br />

inherent goodness ?f his n<strong>at</strong>ure, experiences no tempt<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

to act otherwise than as the dict<strong>at</strong>es of morality demand.<br />

He has, as Aristotle would say, 1 and as Butler agrees, 9<br />

a "settled habit of virtue 19<br />

; or, as popular usage has it,<br />

the habit of acting rightly is, or <strong>at</strong> any r<strong>at</strong>e has become,<br />

second n<strong>at</strong>ure to him. So habitual, so almost instinctive)<br />

would be the virtue of such a man th<strong>at</strong> he might be<br />

described as being almost unconscious of it. For to be<br />

conscious th<strong>at</strong> one is virtuous, is to be complacent, and<br />

complacency <strong>at</strong> any r<strong>at</strong>e in a mortal who, however near<br />

to perfection he may be, can never quite <strong>at</strong>tain it, is a<br />

defect. It follows th<strong>at</strong> the completely good man will be<br />

an unsclfconscious man, unselfconscious, th<strong>at</strong> is to say,<br />

so far as his own virtue is concerned. The good man, then,<br />

is one who n<strong>at</strong>urally, easily, habitually and unselfcon-<br />

sciously does wh<strong>at</strong> is right. So, <strong>at</strong> least, one would n<strong>at</strong>urally<br />

have thought.<br />

(b) THAT VIRTUE MUST BE ACQUIRED. Yet the paradox<br />

of ethics consists in the fact th<strong>at</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> one would n<strong>at</strong>urally<br />

have thought, wh<strong>at</strong> in fact on reflection one still does<br />

think, is not the whole of the truth. For on reflection one<br />

sees th<strong>at</strong> the contrary is also true. It is true, th<strong>at</strong> is to say,<br />

th<strong>at</strong> moral experience, as we understand the term, must<br />

involve an element of struggle. Ifwe never felt any tempt<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

to do wrong, there would be little or no virtue in<br />

doing right. To affirm the contrary, would be to make<br />

the possession of moral virtue a purely n<strong>at</strong>ural endowment<br />

for which one could no more take credit than for the<br />

gift of a good eye <strong>at</strong> games; and th<strong>at</strong> it is such a purely<br />

n<strong>at</strong>ural endowment is a view quite obviously <strong>at</strong> variance<br />

with the judgment of mankind. For the judgment of<br />

mankind holds th<strong>at</strong>, however easily a man's goodness<br />

may sit upon him now, there must have been a time when<br />

he had to struggle to acquire it. The notion of character<br />

form<strong>at</strong>ion, in fact; implies precisely this, th<strong>at</strong> a way of<br />

1 See Chapter IV, p. 99.<br />

s See above, p. 200.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!