04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OBJECTIVE UTILITARIANISM<br />

as the idea of it is pleasant, is a physical and metaphysical<br />

impossibility/*<br />

One more quot<strong>at</strong>ion from John Stuart Mill will clinch<br />

the m<strong>at</strong>ter:<br />

"Pleasure and freedom from pain, are the only things<br />

desirable as ends; and ... all desirable things . . . are<br />

desirable either for the pleasure inherent in themselves,<br />

or as means to the promotion of pleasure and the prevention<br />

of pain."<br />

The effect of the two passages from Mill is to abolish<br />

the distinction which is commonly made between wh<strong>at</strong> is<br />

desirable and wh<strong>at</strong> is desired. Most people, I think,<br />

would distinguish between the meanings of these two<br />

words broadly as follows. They would say th<strong>at</strong> while<br />

many things were desired, only some of these things were<br />

desirable, since only some of them were meet or fitting to<br />

be desired. In making this distinction they would be<br />

passing a judgment of value. Some things, they would<br />

be saying in effect, are such as ought to be desired, whether<br />

in fact they are desired or not. Mill says th<strong>at</strong> there is only<br />

one thing which is such as ought to be desired, namely,<br />

pleasure. As he further maintains, following Bentham,<br />

th<strong>at</strong> only pleasure is in fact desired, the distinction which<br />

is ordinarily made between desired and desirable disappears.<br />

I am proposing to examine in a subsequent chapter 1 the<br />

doctrine th<strong>at</strong> pleasure is alone desirable, and the allied<br />

though different doctrine th<strong>at</strong> only pleasure is in fact<br />

desired. Here it will be sufficient to indic<strong>at</strong>e some of the<br />

difficulties in which Mill became involved, when he<br />

endeavoured to work out his theory in detail. These<br />

difficulties arise from the <strong>at</strong>tempt to combine the utilitarian<br />

doctrine th<strong>at</strong> a right action is one which has the best<br />

consequences with the hedonist contention th<strong>at</strong> pleasure<br />

alone is valuable, or, as it is generally put, th<strong>at</strong> pleasure<br />

alone is the good. The difficulties will be thrown into<br />

relief, if we endeavour to answer two highly important<br />

questions. The first question is, "Is there more than one<br />

Li<br />

*See Chapter XI, pp. 400-415.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!