04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

284<br />

ETHICS<br />

The Moral Faculty Distinguished by Shaftesbury<br />

from the Senses. Its Resemblances to the Reasoning<br />

Part of the Soul. In the first place, though he insists<br />

th<strong>at</strong> "feeling" is <strong>at</strong> once the mainspring and the arbiter of<br />

morality, Shaftesbury ascribes to feeling functions whose<br />

be inclined to<br />

performance most people would n<strong>at</strong>urally<br />

<strong>at</strong>tribute to reason. There is, he says, a number of n<strong>at</strong>ural<br />

impulses in which the Will of N<strong>at</strong>ure expresses itself.. But<br />

morality is not to be found in the indulgence of any one<br />

of them. It is the result r<strong>at</strong>her of a reflective process which,<br />

taking its standpoint outside the circle of n<strong>at</strong>ural impulses,<br />

either approves of or condemns them. The approval and<br />

the condemn<strong>at</strong>ion which morality brings to bear on the<br />

n<strong>at</strong>ural impulses are not exclusively r<strong>at</strong>ional; on the<br />

contrary, they are informed with an emotional quality<br />

in virtue of which we can encourage the indulgence of<br />

the impulses approved, and discourage the indulgence of<br />

the impulses condemned. Although, however, it is pervaded<br />

by this emotional quality, obedience to the moral faculty<br />

is not, Shaftesbury is careful to insist, to be likened either<br />

to the indulgence of the senses or to the gr<strong>at</strong>ific<strong>at</strong>ion of<br />

self-interest.<br />

The whole account is strongly reminiscent of Pl<strong>at</strong>o's<br />

description of the reasoning part of the soul with its characteristic<br />

qualities of "appetition", in virtue of which it<br />

desires the good, and of "con<strong>at</strong>ion", by means of which<br />

it reproves the 1<br />

unruly impulses. It also recalls Butler's<br />

insistence upon the authorit<strong>at</strong>ive aspect of 2<br />

conscience.<br />

In permitting us to make these comparisons Shaftesbury<br />

has, however, travelled a long way from the conception of<br />

an intuitive moral sense derived from and expressing the<br />

Will of N<strong>at</strong>ure, of which we are entitled to ask nothing<br />

in the way ofjustific<strong>at</strong>ion save only th<strong>at</strong> it should function as<br />

the Will of N<strong>at</strong>ure dict<strong>at</strong>es.<br />

While Shaftesbury's move in the direction of Utili-<br />

tarianism is limited to <strong>at</strong>tributing to the moral faculty,<br />

officially identified with feeling, functions which are<br />

1 See Chapter II, pp. 53, 56.<br />

* See Chapter VI, pp. 196, 197.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!