04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SOCIETY. ITS NATURE AND ORIGIN 499<br />

issues and the individual's will, in so far as it is general) is<br />

embodied in the decision to appoint and obey the executive.<br />

This last provision seems r<strong>at</strong>her to destroy the peculiar<br />

significance of the doctrine by restricting the manifest<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

of the General Will to those occasions on which people are<br />

unanimous. But, if they are unanimous, there is, one would<br />

have supposed, no point in introducing the doctrine of the<br />

General Will.<br />

In fact, however, Rousseau does not mean th<strong>at</strong> the General<br />

Will is the same as the unanimous will of the people, for<br />

(5), he- introduces a distinction between the General Will<br />

and the Will of All. "There is often," he says, "a gre<strong>at</strong><br />

deal of difference between the will of all and the general<br />

will ; the l<strong>at</strong>ter takes account only of the common interest,<br />

while the former takes priv<strong>at</strong>e interest into account, and<br />

is no more than a sum of particular wills." In order to<br />

throw this distinction into relief, let us envisage a situ<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

in which all the members of a particular society are<br />

willing, and willing selfishly for the promotion of individual<br />

or sectional interests. We will, however, also suppose<br />

th<strong>at</strong> on a particular occasion there is an accidental<br />

harmony between these individual selfish interests, so th<strong>at</strong><br />

all those who are willing are unanimous. In such circum-<br />

stances Rousseau would say th<strong>at</strong>, although the Will oi<br />

All was expressed, the General Will *as not, for the<br />

reason th<strong>at</strong> the interests embodied in the willing wen<br />

selfish.<br />

Without pressing Rousseau too closely we may say tha<br />

the General Will always exists, th<strong>at</strong> it is always presen<br />

in each one of us, th<strong>at</strong> it is always right, and th<strong>at</strong> thos<br />

m<strong>at</strong>ters which equally concern all the members of th<br />

community constitute the realm of its expression.<br />

Finally, (6), Rousseau maintains th<strong>at</strong>, in so far as th<br />

General Will is it expressed, is the will of an entity, whic<br />

is society. "The body politic," he says, "is also a mor<br />

being, possessed of a will, and this general will, which ten<<br />

.always to the preserv<strong>at</strong>ion and welfare of the whole ar<br />

of every part, and is the source of the laws constitutes f

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!