04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

606 ETHICS AND POLITICS: <strong>THE</strong> MODERNS<br />

Yet in comparison with the theories now to be expounded<br />

the idealist theory of the St<strong>at</strong>e seems remote from and<br />

inapplicable to the conduct of daily<br />

life. This remoteness<br />

appears particularly striking when the idealist theory is<br />

contrasted with Fascism. The idealist theory of the St<strong>at</strong>e<br />

constitutes one of the most important, if unacknowledged,<br />

sources of Fascism. Fascism is, indeed; from one point of<br />

view, simply the theory in action. Yet Fascism is, its<br />

exponents insist, an <strong>at</strong>titude to life as well as a theory<br />

of the St<strong>at</strong>e; a temper of mind no less than a conception<br />

of government. It is not merely a repudi<strong>at</strong>ion of Socialism<br />

and Democracy, it is a renascence of the spirit of man.<br />

While Communism does not make such all-embracing<br />

ethical claims, it entails as directly as does Fascism, a<br />

particular view of ethics. Communism, th<strong>at</strong> is to say,<br />

entails a particular view of the way in which life in a<br />

modern St<strong>at</strong>e should be lived, a view which is rel<strong>at</strong>ed to,<br />

which, indeed, springs from the communist theory of<br />

society and of the n<strong>at</strong>ure of the forces th<strong>at</strong> determine the<br />

form and behaviour of society. Ethics is a subject much<br />

discussed in contemporary Russia. How far should a man's<br />

life be dedic<strong>at</strong>ed to the service of his class in a Capitalist,<br />

or of the St<strong>at</strong>e in a Socialist, society? How far is sexual<br />

behaviour a priv<strong>at</strong>e m<strong>at</strong>ter for the individual's personal<br />

determin<strong>at</strong>ion, how far a public one falling within the<br />

cognisance of the St<strong>at</strong>e? How far is a degree of asceticism<br />

in m<strong>at</strong>ters of e<strong>at</strong>ing, drinking, dancing, love-making,<br />

even of smoking, required (a) of a member of the Communist<br />

Party, (b) of a member of a Communist St<strong>at</strong>e<br />

who is not a member of the Party? Are positive oblig<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

in the way of conduct, laid upon members of the Communist<br />

Party from which non-members are exempt?<br />

Are one standard of conduct and one code of ethics appropri<strong>at</strong>e<br />

to a revolutionary period, another to a counterrevolutionary<br />

period, when enemies have been be<strong>at</strong>en off<br />

and the Socialist St<strong>at</strong>e is in process of being established,<br />

and yet another standard to a *t<strong>at</strong>e of established Communism?<br />

Questions such as these are continuously deb<strong>at</strong>ed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!