04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A <strong>THE</strong>ORY OF GOOD OR VALUE 433<br />

Consequently, on the next occasion on which a white<br />

thing was seen and the baby was told "Th<strong>at</strong>, too, is white,"<br />

there would be no residue of meaning in the baby's mind<br />

for the announcement to call up; there would, therefore,<br />

be no link between this second occasion of knowing a<br />

white thing and the first. Thus the process which is said<br />

to lead to the form<strong>at</strong>ion of abstract ideas would never<br />

be begun, since the baby would never have any found<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

on which to build. For if, on the first occasion on which<br />

the word "white" was mentioned to it, the word was<br />

on the second<br />

meaningless, it would be meaningless<br />

occasion also. Now all people do have a general conception<br />

of whiteness. The conception, therefore, must<br />

have been reached by some other method, and on Pl<strong>at</strong>o's<br />

view,<br />

it must have been known in some sense from the<br />

first.<br />

Let us again revert to the first occasion on which a<br />

baby is told "Th<strong>at</strong> is white". If the expression "Th<strong>at</strong> is<br />

white" is meaningless for it, then, as we have seen, the<br />

process which ends in the comprehension of the general<br />

idea of whiteness could never have begun. Pl<strong>at</strong>o concludes,<br />

therefore, th<strong>at</strong> on the first occasion on which the words<br />

"Th<strong>at</strong> is white " were addressed to the baby, they could not<br />

have been quite meaningless. There must, then, have been<br />

something in the baby's mind to which the expression<br />

"Th<strong>at</strong> is white" hitched on, and wh<strong>at</strong> can this something<br />

have been except a knowledge of wh<strong>at</strong> "being white"<br />

means? To know wh<strong>at</strong> "being white" means, is to have a<br />

kind of knowledge of the universal whiteness, and to have<br />

it from the first.<br />

Pl<strong>at</strong>o generalizes this point as follows. Whenever we<br />

come to know something on wh<strong>at</strong> appears to us to be the<br />

first occasion, the fact th<strong>at</strong> we do come to know it presupposes<br />

some original acquaintance with wh<strong>at</strong> is known.<br />

To put the point in another way, we cannot learn some-<br />

thing new without already in some sense knowing<br />

wh<strong>at</strong> it<br />

is th<strong>at</strong> we want to learn. Thus the thing learned turns out<br />

not to have been completely new, and the so-called learn-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!