04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NATURE OF <strong>THE</strong> MORAL FACULTY 307<br />

evidence accumul<strong>at</strong>ed in such a book as Oswald Spengler's<br />

The Decline of the West, in favour of the view th<strong>at</strong> the major<br />

movements of history have been cyclical in character, so<br />

regularly do eras of stagn<strong>at</strong>ion, decay and relapse appear to<br />

follow eras of progress.<br />

(ill) IF <strong>THE</strong>Y DO, IT IS NOT CLEAR THAT <strong>THE</strong> PROGRESS<br />

is DESIGNED OR is IN ACCORDANCE WITH A PLAN. Let<br />

us suppose th<strong>at</strong> societies do evolve and progress, and th<strong>at</strong><br />

we know broadly wh<strong>at</strong> we mean by saying th<strong>at</strong> they do.<br />

The question then arises, is the evolution, is the progress<br />

accidental or designed? Is it, in other words, the result of<br />

a series of happy chances, or is it the expression of an<br />

advancing evolutionary purpose? Can we in fact assign<br />

to the development of the human race an ideal end or<br />

goal, by<br />

reference to which we can claim an absolute<br />

validity for the judgments of the moral sense, on the<br />

ground th<strong>at</strong> they are concerned to further the advance of<br />

the human race in the direction of an ever gre<strong>at</strong>er realiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

of this ideal, and then deduce th<strong>at</strong> this advance<br />

takes place in pursuance of a definite plan?<br />

The bearing of this question upon the issue we are<br />

discussing is obvious. If changes in society which appear<br />

to constitute an advance in the direction of an ideal, are,<br />

nevertheless, arbitrary and irresponsible, then the code of<br />

morality which supports them is equally irresponsible.<br />

Again, if the process which we know as social evolution<br />

does not involve an ethical advance, or if, though it does<br />

do so, the advance is accidental, then the deliverances of<br />

the moral sense which both support the stage of social<br />

evolution which has <strong>at</strong> any moment been reached, and<br />

conduce to the realiz<strong>at</strong>ion of a further stage, are them-<br />

selves devoid of th<strong>at</strong> ultim<strong>at</strong>e validity which a discernible<br />

and necessary rel<strong>at</strong>ion to an evolutionary purpose can alone<br />

bestow, and morality becomes, in Professor Muirhead's<br />

words, "nothing but th<strong>at</strong> kind of conduct which supports<br />

one or other of the accidental changes in the phantasmagoria<br />

of social forms"

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!