04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OBJECTIVE INTUITIONISM 213<br />

not blind us to the existence of this n<strong>at</strong>ural tendency to<br />

pursue wh<strong>at</strong> Socr<strong>at</strong>es would have called the Good.<br />

The truth th<strong>at</strong> wrong conduct requires an incentive,<br />

right conduct none, illustr<strong>at</strong>es and reinforces Kant's distinction<br />

between the c<strong>at</strong>egorical and the hypothetical<br />

imper<strong>at</strong>ives. The moral law, as he would say, takes no<br />

account of it is consequences; obeyed, when it is obeyed,<br />

for its own sake, whereas action prompted by desire always<br />

has in view the achievement ofsome end beyond the action.<br />

Criticism of Kant's Moral Theory.<br />

(i) THAT KANT GIVES.NO <strong>GUIDE</strong> <strong>TO</strong> DUTY. A general<br />

criticism of the doctrines which objective-intuitionists hold<br />

in common will be found in Chapter VIII. The views of<br />

Kant are, however, so distinctive th<strong>at</strong> they are entitled to<br />

consider<strong>at</strong>ion in their own right, apart from the general<br />

doctrines which they exemplify. Of the many serious<br />

objections to which Kant's moral theory is exposed, the<br />

majority are in the n<strong>at</strong>ure of criticisms of his general<br />

metaphysical position, with its sharp separ<strong>at</strong>ion between<br />

the world of things as they are and the world of things<br />

as they appear, r<strong>at</strong>her than of his ethical doctrines proper.<br />

These it is beyond the scope of the present book to discuss, 1<br />

yet, since the ethical theory entails the metaphysical, they<br />

are in truth criticisms of the one no less than of the other.<br />

Other criticisms, however, apply specifically to the<br />

ethical doctrine. Three of these may be mentioned.<br />

In an earlier<br />

1<br />

chapter, 1 urged th<strong>at</strong> the problem of ethics<br />

is a double one; there is the problem of how to do your<br />

duty, and the problem of how to find out wh<strong>at</strong> your duty<br />

is. In the discussion referred to, I criticized Socr<strong>at</strong>es's<br />

doctrine th<strong>at</strong> virtue is knowledge on the ground th<strong>at</strong>,<br />

while it made ample provision for the recognition of the<br />

Good, it did not deal with the problem of our frequent<br />

failure to pursue the Good th<strong>at</strong> we recognize; th<strong>at</strong>, in<br />

1 Some account of them will be found in my Gmd* to Philosopip,<br />

Chapter XIV. *<br />

1 Chapter II, pp. 42-46.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!