04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>THE</strong> PROBLEM OF FREE WILL 975<br />

OF <strong>THE</strong> BttAiN. This conclusion applies with even gre<strong>at</strong>er<br />

force to those forms of determinism which base themselves<br />

upon M<strong>at</strong>erialism. For these, as we have seen, maintain th<strong>at</strong><br />

mental events are either disguised bodily events or <strong>at</strong><br />

least determined by bodily events. The psychology of<br />

Behaviourism, for example, asserts th<strong>at</strong> thought consists<br />

of bodily movements, more particularly of movements<br />

in the larynx. Now the movements of the body may be<br />

necessary and determined, but they can no more be true<br />

than a quadr<strong>at</strong>ic equ<strong>at</strong>ion can be purple or a musical<br />

chord can be covetous. It is, of course, the case th<strong>at</strong> I<br />

may feel convinced th<strong>at</strong> my thinking rel<strong>at</strong>es to the out-<br />

side world and correctly informs me of wh<strong>at</strong> happens there.<br />

But this conviction of mine is only another thought, and,<br />

therefore, a set of laryngeal movements, which, as I have<br />

pointed out, cannot of their very n<strong>at</strong>ure refer to anything<br />

outside themselves.<br />

It is also the case, if Behaviourism is correct, th<strong>at</strong> these<br />

arguments ofmine are themselves no more than movements<br />

in my larynx and nervous system which arc causally<br />

linked to other movements in my hand, as I write, and my<br />

face, as I talk. Therefore, they do not refer to Behaviourism<br />

<strong>at</strong> all. The reader's view of them is another set of<br />

movements in his larynx, and the belief th<strong>at</strong> this is the<br />

correct description both of the arguments and of the reader's<br />

view of them is another set. It is impossible on these lines<br />

to find any basis from which thought can oper<strong>at</strong>e, for there<br />

are no common premises, no common presumptions, and<br />

no common conclusions of thought. On the basis of a<br />

thorough-going M<strong>at</strong>erialism, every<br />

so-called thinker is<br />

boxed up within the circle of his own experiences. Thus<br />

the m<strong>at</strong>erialist locks up the mind if, indeed, he admits<br />

a mind <strong>at</strong> all in a cell % whose walls are the .neural and<br />

cerebral movements of his own body, which movements<br />

he plays no part in initi<strong>at</strong>ing. And, since nothing which<br />

mind experiences can reach it from outside these walls,<br />

so nothing th<strong>at</strong> it thinks can refer to anything outside them.<br />

M<strong>at</strong>erialism, then, which purports to be thought about

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!