04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OBJECTIVE UTILITARIANISM 333<br />

being one who keeps this standard always<br />

in mind and<br />

directs his legisl<strong>at</strong>ion by reference to it. Hence the good<br />

legisl<strong>at</strong>or is he who, being concerned to promote the welfare<br />

of makes an societyf accur<strong>at</strong>e calcul<strong>at</strong>ion of the effects<br />

which his measures will have* in increasing the happiness<br />

of its members.<br />

And not only the good legisl<strong>at</strong>or, but also the good citizen !<br />

He, too, should aim <strong>at</strong> the general happiness. And if it<br />

be asked why he should, or why he should find s<strong>at</strong>isfaction<br />

in other people's happiness, if he can only desire his own<br />

(position A) , or why any course of action should appeal<br />

to him as being good or right except in so far as he judges .<br />

it likely to increase his own happiness (position B), Bentham<br />

answers by casually invoking the oper<strong>at</strong>ion of a vaguely<br />

conceived social sense which, he holds, leads us to take<br />

pleasure in the pleasure of other persons.<br />

Bentham, as I have already remarked, failed to work<br />

out any detailed and consistent theory of ethics, but, if<br />

pressed, he would defend his position much as Hobbes,<br />

whose tre<strong>at</strong>ment of pity I have already referred to,<br />

1<br />

defends a similar position, by saying th<strong>at</strong> benevolence is<br />

a motive to action, only because men are so constituted<br />

th<strong>at</strong> the pleasure* of others give them pleasure. Finally,<br />

Bentham might take a leaf out of the book of Glaucon<br />

and Adeimantus* and point out th<strong>at</strong>, since society takes<br />

pains to encourage socially benevolent and to discourage<br />

socially injurious actions, the action which benefits other<br />

people will, in a good society, be the same as the action<br />

which benefits oneself.<br />

J. S. Mill on the Duty of Promoting Others' Happiness.<br />

Bcntham's theory identifies "is" and "ought." To quote an<br />

illumin<strong>at</strong>ing judgment by M. Hallvy, Bentham believed<br />

' '<br />

th<strong>at</strong> he had discovered in the principle of utility a practical<br />

commandment as well as a scientific law, a proposition<br />

which teaches us <strong>at</strong> one and the same time wh<strong>at</strong> as and<br />

wh<strong>at</strong> ought to be". But things cannot, one feels, be quite<br />

1 See Chapter VI, p. 185.<br />

* See Chapter I, pp. 92-23.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!