04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

874<br />

ETHICS<br />

then the fact th<strong>at</strong> I do think it to<br />

event in my past history,<br />

be true, even die fact th<strong>at</strong> I believe myself to be in a posi-<br />

tion to prow it to be true, is no reason for thinking it to be<br />

so. For to prove it, if to prove it to somebody, and die somebody<br />

is no more responsible for being convinced by my<br />

proof than am I for believing it to be convincing.<br />

Detenninists do not think of applying these considera-<br />

tions to the conclusions of their own reasonings. When, for<br />

example, they are advoc<strong>at</strong>ing detenninist views, they make<br />

much of the impartial survey of the facts upon which their<br />

reasoning is based, stress the rigour of die reasoning by<br />

which they reach their conclusions, and draw <strong>at</strong>tention<br />

to the open-minded and dispassion<strong>at</strong>e character of their<br />

acceptance of the conclusions which necessarily follow<br />

from the facts, wounding though these conclusions may<br />

be to human pride, derog<strong>at</strong>ory though they are .to human<br />

dignity. But wh<strong>at</strong> right, it may be asked, have they to<br />

claim impartiality for their survey of the evidence, validity<br />

for the processes of their reasoning, and dispassion<strong>at</strong>eness<br />

for the acceptance, of their conclusion, if they deny the<br />

possibility of impartiality in iry survey of the compar<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

worths of altern<strong>at</strong>ive courses of action, and the dispassion<strong>at</strong>eness<br />

of my preference for one of them as bring the<br />

better? For, if they insist th<strong>at</strong> my judgment of wh<strong>at</strong> is<br />

right and reasonable in the sphere of conduct is determined<br />

for me by my past and not by me through my will, the same<br />

will hold good of their judgments of wh<strong>at</strong> is true and<br />

reasonable in the sphere of thought. Th<strong>at</strong> determinism is<br />

true and reasonable is one such judgment, but in the degree<br />

to which their arguments establish th<strong>at</strong> it is true and<br />

reasonable, in th<strong>at</strong> degree does the conclusion invalid<strong>at</strong>e<br />

their arguments. For in showing th<strong>at</strong> nobody ever embraces<br />

determinism because he is really convinced by<br />

the arguments for it, the detenninist takes all the convincingness<br />

out of determinism.<br />

(a) THAT IF DETERMINISM zs TRUE <strong>THE</strong> MIND<br />

REFLECTS NOT <strong>THE</strong> FACTS BUT <strong>THE</strong> CONDITION

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!