04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OBJECTIVE INTUITIONISM 2CK)<br />

people are prepared to accumul<strong>at</strong>e property 'by lawful<br />

methods, th<strong>at</strong> it is worth while for some people to try and<br />

disembarrass them of it by unlawful ones.<br />

The fact th<strong>at</strong> evil is in this sense parasitic upon good,<br />

th<strong>at</strong> it is, in other words, the prevalence of good conduct<br />

among the many th<strong>at</strong> mftkfff bod conduct <strong>at</strong>tractive to some,<br />

has a political significance, to which I shall have occasion<br />

to refer to in a l<strong>at</strong>er chapter rel<strong>at</strong>ing to the coercive<br />

function of the St<strong>at</strong>e. 1<br />

Its present relevance is to serve as an illustr<strong>at</strong>ion of Kant's<br />

general principle, th<strong>at</strong> moral conduct can be universalized<br />

without contradiction, while immoral conduct cannot.<br />

Hence, he says, we should always act in a way such th<strong>at</strong><br />

we can wiH everybody ebe to act in the same way without<br />

producing conflict or contradiction.<br />

Not Making Exceptions in the Self's Favour. Kant's<br />

maxim has a further significance. A gre<strong>at</strong> part of wh<strong>at</strong> we<br />

call wrong action consists in doing in one's own person<br />

something th<strong>at</strong> one would reprob<strong>at</strong>e in another. Everybody<br />

recognizes certain duties, even if it is only the duty<br />

to promote his own maximum self-development. When<br />

one acts in a way which one believes to be wrong, pre-<br />

ferring the indulgence of one's own desires to following<br />

the dict<strong>at</strong>es of the moral imper<strong>at</strong>ive, one is condoning in<br />

oneself a devi<strong>at</strong>ion from moral rules which one would<br />

censure in another. One is, th<strong>at</strong> is to say, making an<br />

exception in one's owit favour. But if everybody habitually<br />

made exceptions in his own favour, ordered society would<br />

rapidly become impossible. For example, I may permit<br />

myself to travel on a special occasion without a railway<br />

ticket because, let us say, I have no money, or because<br />

I want to spend wh<strong>at</strong>ever money I have on something<br />

else; but if everybody habitually indulged himself in this<br />

way <strong>at</strong> the expense of the railway company, the company<br />

would go bankrupt and railway travel would cease. Kant,<br />

therefore, makes the point th<strong>at</strong> it is characteristic of moral<br />

1 See Chapter XIX, pp. 778-781.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!