04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>THE</strong> IDEALIST <strong>THE</strong>ORY OF <strong>THE</strong> STATE 573<br />

strike the English reader as unrealistic. It constitutes,<br />

Indeed, a pre-eminent example of th<strong>at</strong> a prim reasoning<br />

whose validity in rel<strong>at</strong>ion to political and ethical problems<br />

is, as I suggested 1 in the last chapter, open to question.<br />

In spite, however, of the abstract and remote character<br />

of the theory, it is highly important, both because it<br />

represents the logical development ofseveral lines ofthought which in earlier chapters I have been engaged in following,<br />

and because of the philosophical sanction which it<br />

would seem to bestow upon the policies of St<strong>at</strong>es in the<br />

contemporary world. I will, first, say something of the<br />

various lines of thought which may be regarded as the<br />

ancestors of the theory; I will then briefly outline its main<br />

fe<strong>at</strong>ures, and indic<strong>at</strong>e some of the corollaries th<strong>at</strong> follow<br />

from it.<br />

I. ANCES<strong>TO</strong>RS OF <strong>THE</strong> <strong>THE</strong>ORY<br />

Common to* all those who have followed wh<strong>at</strong>, for the<br />

sake of brevity, I propose to call idealist modes of political<br />

thinking are a rejection of the Social Contract theory<br />

(except in so far as Rousseau inherited and took over<br />

the theory as part of the framework of his thought), a<br />

refusal to entertain doctrines of n<strong>at</strong>ural rights, except in<br />

the Ideological sense defined by T. H. Green, a disavowal<br />

of popular sovereignty (Rousseau again excepted), and an<br />

insistence upon the n<strong>at</strong>ural as opposed to the artificial<br />

st<strong>at</strong>us and origin of society.<br />

Views of Burke<br />

(i)<br />

Let us consider in the light of these denials and insist*<br />

ences the views of Edmund Burke (1729-1797) as .set out<br />

in his Speeches and Letters. At his criticisms of the Social<br />

Contract theory and the doctrine of N<strong>at</strong>ural Rights I have<br />

already glanced. 1 They embody a number offe<strong>at</strong>ures which<br />

recur in the best conserv<strong>at</strong>ive thought of every gener<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

and which most readers will <strong>at</strong> once recognize as familiar<br />

1 See Chapter XIV, p. 558-560.<br />

f See Chapter XIV, pp. 546-549-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!