04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

564<br />

POLITICS<br />

God. Similarly, the feet th<strong>at</strong> no historian has ever been<br />

able to point to the signing of an historical contract, would<br />

not invalid<strong>at</strong>e the conclusion th<strong>at</strong> an implied contract was<br />

a logical presupposition of the existence and functioning<br />

of society. If a geometrical figure is found to have three<br />

internal angles which are equal to two right angles, the<br />

feet justifies us in concluding th<strong>at</strong> the figure in question is a<br />

triangle. But nobody wishes to argue th<strong>at</strong> the feet of its<br />

being a triangle precedes in time the feet of its having<br />

three angles which are equal to 180. The two facts logically<br />

entail one another, but they do not succeed one another.<br />

Similarly, the feet th<strong>at</strong> the existence of societies .entails<br />

a willingness on the part of individuals to live in society<br />

does not mean th<strong>at</strong> this willingness ever expressed itself<br />

in a definite contract to form society, or th<strong>at</strong> the societies<br />

which actually exist to-day were formed as the result of<br />

such a contract<br />

To Wh<strong>at</strong> are There Rights? If the notion of an<br />

historical contract is dropped, the doctrine of N<strong>at</strong>ural<br />

Rights loses much of its plausibility. The doctrine is, it is<br />

obvious, a product of the same type of a priori reasoning<br />

as the Social Contract theory with which it has been<br />

historically associ<strong>at</strong>ed. A "right" is an abstract sort<br />

of thing which derives its n<strong>at</strong>ure and authority from no<br />

more impressive source than the mind of the thinker<br />

who conceives it. As one reads the advoc<strong>at</strong>es of N<strong>at</strong>ural<br />

Rights, one feels a certain symp<strong>at</strong>hy with the critic who<br />

asked to be shown a right.<br />

For wh<strong>at</strong> rights are there, and how are they to be<br />

discovered? There seems to be on way of determining the<br />

answers to these questions. Theorists can and do announce<br />

th<strong>at</strong> there are such and such rights to such and such<br />

privileges; they even make lists of rights, but they are<br />

<strong>at</strong> a loss to give reasons for the inclusion of any particular<br />

right upon their list. Ifwe press them to do so, they respond<br />

with a number of divergent dogm<strong>at</strong>isms which are sup-<br />

ported by nothing but the convictions of their authors.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!