04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

336<br />

ETHICS<br />

Not being tied to an egoistic psychology, Adam Smith is<br />

enabled to do justice to wh<strong>at</strong> would be normally called<br />

the altruistic sentiments. His account gives full weight to<br />

the pain which we feel for others' distress, and the pleasure<br />

which we take in allevi<strong>at</strong>ing it, without making the mistake<br />

of supposing th<strong>at</strong> the removal of our pain, the promotion of<br />

our pleasure, constitute the sole motive for action taken<br />

to relieve distress. The mistake consists precisely in a<br />

failure to see th<strong>at</strong>, since an initial concern for the welfare<br />

of other people is a condition of my symp<strong>at</strong>hetic pleasure<br />

in the allevi<strong>at</strong>ion of their distress, such interest cannot<br />

itself be dependent upon or conditioned by my pleasure.<br />

If, therefore, we are to admit th<strong>at</strong> symp<strong>at</strong>hy can constitute<br />

a genuine motive for action, we must also agree th<strong>at</strong> it<br />

is possible for the agent to feel an interest in something<br />

other than his own st<strong>at</strong>es of consciousness. If he can feel<br />

an interest in something other, then it is not the case, as<br />

Mill's position A asserts, th<strong>at</strong> he can only desire his own<br />

pleasure.<br />

Mill on Social Good. Mill vainly tries to escape<br />

from this difficulty.<br />

The principle of utility which he maintains we ought<br />

to follow as our guide to conduct, aims <strong>at</strong> producing the<br />

gre<strong>at</strong>est happiness of the gre<strong>at</strong>est number; if the happiness<br />

of the individual conflicts with this principle, the individual<br />

must go to the wall. "In the golden rule of Jesus of<br />

Nazareth," he writes, "we read the complete spirit of the<br />

ethics of utility. To do as you would be done by, and to<br />

love your neighbour as yourself,<br />

constitute the ideal<br />

perfection of utilitarian morality." It is right, therefore,<br />

to promote the happiness of others. But how can this be,<br />

ifone is so constituted th<strong>at</strong> one can only desire the happiness<br />

of oneself?<br />

Let us suppose th<strong>at</strong> A can, by doing an action P, produce<br />

an amount of happiness X for himself, and an amount of<br />

happiness Y for three other people. Let us suppose th<strong>at</strong> by<br />

doing another action Q, he can produce an amount of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!