04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

754 ETHICS AND POLITICS: <strong>THE</strong> MODERNS<br />

ofall the associ<strong>at</strong>ions to which the individual belongs, the<br />

St<strong>at</strong>e is the only one which he does not join by his own<br />

voluntary act. The individual joins ethical and economic<br />

associ<strong>at</strong>ions by choice. He belongs to them because they<br />

s<strong>at</strong>isfy a need of his n<strong>at</strong>ure, or a want of his pocket To<br />

the St<strong>at</strong>e he belongs because he happens to have been born<br />

in a certain locality, an event over which he had, we must<br />

presume, no control. The origin of the claim which a<br />

St<strong>at</strong>e makes upon its individual members is thus a graphicaltopo-<br />

accident<br />

<strong>THE</strong> CASE OF <strong>THE</strong> CONSCIENTIOUS OBJEC<strong>TO</strong>R<br />

IN WAR-TIME. It not infrequently happens th<strong>at</strong> a<br />

man's motive for joining a particular associ<strong>at</strong>ion is his<br />

feeling of the inadequacy of the provision made for his<br />

spiritual or ethical needs by the St<strong>at</strong>e. In such a case it is<br />

hard to believe th<strong>at</strong> the St<strong>at</strong>e is entitled to assume th<strong>at</strong>, in<br />

time of conflict, the individual should yield unfaltering<br />

allegiance to the organiz<strong>at</strong>ion which has failed to s<strong>at</strong>isfy<br />

his needs, and flout the claims of the particular associ<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

which may be presumed not to have so failed. The case<br />

of the conscientious objector to military service in wartime<br />

affords a good instance of the point <strong>at</strong> issue. The<br />

conscientious objector says in effect, 'I recognize th<strong>at</strong> I<br />

am a member of a political associ<strong>at</strong>ion called the St<strong>at</strong>e,<br />

and th<strong>at</strong> this associ<strong>at</strong>ion from which I derive my social<br />

consciousness has important claims upon me. At the same<br />

time I am a member of another and larger associ<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

namely, the human race. In certain cases the claims of<br />

the St<strong>at</strong>e and the claims of humanity may conflict; such<br />

an occasion has now arisen, and I am bound to consider<br />

to which of the two I owe the gre<strong>at</strong>er allegiance. It is not<br />

a foregone conclusion th<strong>at</strong> I should in ail<br />

obey the claims of the Stale, and I must above all retain<br />

the right to decide according to the dict<strong>at</strong>es of my<br />

conscience/<br />

In coercing such a man, the St<strong>at</strong>e is exercising a power to<br />

which only the idealist theory ofSt<strong>at</strong>e entitles it to lay claim.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!