04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OBJECTIVE UTILITARIANISM 343<br />

found<strong>at</strong>ion of an egoistic psychology, we can assign no<br />

meaning to the word "ought", except a meaning<br />

derived from expediency. We can say, for example,<br />

th<strong>at</strong> a man ought to behave in a particular way because,<br />

if he does, he will derive more s<strong>at</strong>isfaction than he will<br />

derive from behaving in any other way, but we cannot<br />

say th<strong>at</strong> he ought to behave in a particular way because<br />

it is right, and right because it will promote the gre<strong>at</strong>est<br />

happiness of the gre<strong>at</strong>est number of people. For there is<br />

no reason why a man should wish to promote the gre<strong>at</strong>est<br />

happiness of the gre<strong>at</strong>est number of people, except in so<br />

far as it conduces to his own, and th<strong>at</strong> it does not always<br />

do this, has already been pointed out. The conclusion is<br />

th<strong>at</strong> an egoistic psychology can afford no basis for the<br />

concept of duty. Yet the utilitarians were imbued with a<br />

very proper respect for duty, and, though Bentham was<br />

ought V' he said, "if<br />

unregener<strong>at</strong>ely logical "the wow! '<br />

it means anything <strong>at</strong> all 'ought' to be excluded from the<br />

dictionary" J. S. Mill inveighed, as we have seen, with<br />

considerable emphasis against the selfish egoist.<br />

(a) <strong>THE</strong> IMPOSSIBILITY OF AVOIDING <strong>THE</strong><br />

ADMISSION OF INTUITIONS. Directly he abandons<br />

the psychology of Egoism, the utilitarian is driven to admit<br />

some <strong>at</strong> least of the contentions of the intuitionist. For,<br />

directly he says th<strong>at</strong> we ought to do so and so, because<br />

of such and such results which will follow if it is done,<br />

he is implying th<strong>at</strong> such and such results are desirable<br />

and are such as ought to be promoted. In the long run,<br />

there can be no basis for<br />

as I have already tried to show1 ,<br />

such a claim except an intuition which it is not to defend by<br />

possible<br />

reason.<br />

Nor, as I have already pointed out, 1 does the utilitarian<br />

disown intuitions. His theory entails, it is obvious, the<br />

admission of such intuitions as th<strong>at</strong> pleasure is the sole<br />

good, th<strong>at</strong> we ought to maximize pleasure on the whole,<br />

and th<strong>at</strong> the pleasure of every person is of equal value with<br />

*See Chapter V, pp. 166-171. Sec pp. 322, 323 above.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!