04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A <strong>THE</strong>ORY OF GOOD OR VALUE 465<br />

Much has been said in previous pages with regard to<br />

the vari<strong>at</strong>ions in the deliverances of the moral sense in<br />

different communities. The conclusion was reached th<strong>at</strong><br />

these vari<strong>at</strong>ions were not purely arbitrary, but stood in<br />

a specific rel<strong>at</strong>ion to the needs of the society to which the<br />

individual happened to belong. 1 And not only to the needs<br />

and circumstances of his society but also to those of his class<br />

within society. Thus the moral valu<strong>at</strong>ions of a slave will<br />

be different from those of a free man, and qualities of<br />

independence and leadership, which are valued in a<br />

member of the English public-school class, will tend to<br />

be condemned as upstart impudence and unprincipled<br />

ambition when they appear in the Communist worker,<br />

who devotes his energies and his talents to leading and<br />

organizing his fellows. Now, the needs of classes in a society<br />

vary. Hence, a certain course of action by a member of<br />

class X, which will seem right to another member of th<strong>at</strong><br />

class, will seem wrong to a member of class Y, but would<br />

have seemed right to him, if it had been taken by another<br />

member of class Y. In a word, moral valu<strong>at</strong>ions are rel<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

to social need, circumstance and st<strong>at</strong>us.<br />

In most societies th<strong>at</strong> have existed there has been a<br />

marked divergence between the conduct th<strong>at</strong> men called<br />

right, and which a morally virtuous man felt it, therefore,<br />

to be his duty to do, and th<strong>at</strong> which was in fact right. In<br />

other words, the conduct which a morally virtuous man has<br />

felt it to be his duty to do has often, has, in fact, usually,<br />

produced consequences which contained a smaller amount<br />

of absolute value than would have been contained in the<br />

consequences of other actions which it was open<br />

to the<br />

agent to do, but which he did not consider to be his duty.<br />

How is the Divergence between wh<strong>at</strong> is Thought Right<br />

and Wh<strong>at</strong> is Right to be Adjusted? How is this divergence<br />

to be adjusted? How, in other words for this and nothing<br />

else is involved is a man to be induced to wish to do<br />

wh<strong>at</strong> is really right and to desire and to pursue wh<strong>at</strong> i#*<br />

* See Chapter VIII, pp. 301-303.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!