04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

362<br />

* ETHICS<br />

and J. S. Mill were. l<strong>at</strong>er to put forward; this factor also<br />

enables him to claim, for his theory of ethics a certain<br />

degree of objectivism. The novelty consists in Hume's<br />

identific<strong>at</strong>ion of good not with th<strong>at</strong> which is approved of<br />

by me, but with th<strong>at</strong> which is approved of by all or most<br />

men.<br />

His theory briefly is as follows. There is, first, a definition<br />

of good; to say th<strong>at</strong> X is good means, in Hume's view,<br />

th<strong>at</strong> X is such th<strong>at</strong> the contempl<strong>at</strong>ion of it calls forth<br />

an emotion of approval in all or most men; not, be it noted,<br />

in the agent or in the person judging, or even in the<br />

members of a particular society, but in all or most of the<br />

men who are now alive, or who have ever been alive*<br />

Secondly, there is an affirm<strong>at</strong>ion in regard to wh<strong>at</strong> things<br />

are good, th<strong>at</strong> is to say, in regard to those things which<br />

call forth an emotion of approval in all or in most men.<br />

The affirm<strong>at</strong>ion is hedonistic. There are, Hume thinks,<br />

two classes of actions, of the qualities of things and of the<br />

characters of human beings, which are good in the sense<br />

defined, namely, those actions which are pleasant to the<br />

agent, those qualities of things which are pleasant to their<br />

possessor, and those characters of individuals which give<br />

pleasure to others, and also those actions, qualities, and<br />

characters which are useful. Hume proceeds to define<br />

useful as meaning, indirectly conducive to pleasure in<br />

the agent, in the possessor, or in other men. He holds<br />

also th<strong>at</strong> the converse of these assertions is true, namely,<br />

th<strong>at</strong> only those actions, qualities and characters which<br />

are directly pleasant or indirectly conducive to pleasure,<br />

evoke the emotion of approval in all or most men, and<br />

so are called good.<br />

Hume's Form of Hedonism. Hume, then, is a hedonist,<br />

but a hedonist of a r<strong>at</strong>her peculiar kind. He does not<br />

assert th<strong>at</strong> we are so constituted th<strong>at</strong> we can only<br />

desire pleasure, nor does he say th<strong>at</strong> pleasure is good or<br />

is the only good, nor th<strong>at</strong> pleasure and good mean the<br />

same thing. He would agree th<strong>at</strong> the words pleasure and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!