04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>THE</strong> SPLIT 135<br />

be maintained by similar means. The assumption throughout<br />

is th<strong>at</strong> the holder of power is not required to take<br />

account of morals, expediency bring his sole guide to<br />

conduct. Given th<strong>at</strong> he has certain ends, security for his<br />

person and unquestioned dominion over his subjects, by<br />

wh<strong>at</strong> means, Machiavelli asks, may these ends be most<br />

effectively realized?<br />

But although the sole motive recognized throughout<br />

Machiavelli's tre<strong>at</strong>ment of politics is th<strong>at</strong> of self-interest,<br />

it is not strictly correct to say th<strong>at</strong> morals are left out<br />

of the writer's purview. Machiavelli does tre<strong>at</strong> of morals<br />

and also of religion, but only as instruments to be used<br />

to his advantage by the intelligent ruler. The found<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

of morals and religion are not objective principles or<br />

factors in the universe existing independently of man<br />

and recognized by him; there are, indeed, no such<br />

principles and man cannot, therefore, recognize them,<br />

or guide his conduct by reference to them. Morals being<br />

excluded from the scheme of things, there can be no<br />

guide to conduct except self-interest. Nevertheless morals,<br />

though they possess no objective basis, may be usefully<br />

invoked by rulers to induce in the common people reverence<br />

and obedience. Morals have, in fact, as we should say<br />

to-day, good publicity and propaganda value. All this,<br />

it is clear, is neither ethics nor politics. It may, of course,<br />

be the case th<strong>at</strong> both these branches of study are in fact<br />

will-o'-the-wisps; th<strong>at</strong> there are no principles of right<br />

and wrong which should govern human conduct, no<br />

principles of justice which should guide the ruler of the<br />

St<strong>at</strong>e. But if it be the case th<strong>at</strong> ethics and politics own<br />

some basis of principle other than th<strong>at</strong> of pure expediency,<br />

then it cannot be said th<strong>at</strong> Machiavelli contributes to<br />

their study. His work is, as he himself suggests, properly<br />

to be regarded as a contribution to our knowledge of<br />

n<strong>at</strong>ural, th<strong>at</strong> is of human, history.<br />

The Split Widens. It is, I think, sufficiently clear from<br />

the foregoing examples of political thought in the Middle

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!