04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>THE</strong>ORY OF FASCISM 643<br />

of true liberty as the "finding out, or being forced to find<br />

out) the right p<strong>at</strong>h and to walk thereon". But who, one<br />

wonders, is to exert the force which is necessary to enable<br />

common men to find the right p<strong>at</strong>h? The answer can<br />

only be, those whom Carlyle denomin<strong>at</strong>es as "Superiors"<br />

or "Heroes"; those, namely, who, we are to presume,<br />

have already found it Hence the problem of government<br />

is for Carlyle simply th<strong>at</strong> of finding "your Real-Superiors",<br />

and letting them govern you, while democracy is the<br />

form of government into which communities lapse in the<br />

absence of Real-Superiors to govern them. Democracy<br />

means, for Carlyle, "despair of finding any Heroes to<br />

govern you, and contented putting up with the want<br />

of them".<br />

Mazzini (1805-1872) looked not to individuals but to<br />

the n<strong>at</strong>ion to discover the moral law. His writings are,<br />

unfortun<strong>at</strong>ely, not as clear as could be wished, but broadly<br />

his view is th<strong>at</strong> democracy is tolerable as a form of government<br />

in so far as it observes the moral law, but th<strong>at</strong>, if<br />

it does not, the people are not, or ought not to be (for<br />

there is the confusion between "fact" and "ought"<br />

which we have already noticed in discussing the theory<br />

of Sovereignty) 1<br />

sovereign, and the people's will ought<br />

not to be obeyed. "The simple vote of a majority", Mazzini<br />

writes, "does not constitute sovereignty, if it evidently<br />

contradicts the supreme moral precepts ... the will<br />

of the people is sacred, when it interprets and applies<br />

the moral law; null and impotent when it dissoci<strong>at</strong>es<br />

itself from the law, and only represents caprice." And,<br />

if the people's will does not "interpret the moral law",<br />

then the inference seems inescapable although Mazzini<br />

does not draw it the people must be directed from above.<br />

The " Superior " Man is he who Embodies the General<br />

Will. This inference is unhesit<strong>at</strong>ingly drawn by Italian<br />

fascists, who argue as follows. Questions of right and<br />

wrong are m<strong>at</strong>ters of objective and discernible fact,<br />

1 See Chapter XIV, p. 514.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!