04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOCIETY. ITS NATURE AND ORIGIN 507<br />

sectional interest. It is not likely, therefore, to be advo-<br />

c<strong>at</strong>ed by any one sectional interest in opposition to another.<br />

In so far, therefore, as it is advoc<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong> all, it will tend to<br />

be advoc<strong>at</strong>ed only by those who have <strong>at</strong> heart the communal<br />

interest.<br />

(4) The communal interest is the same for all. There-<br />

fore, when I will the communal interest, wh<strong>at</strong> I am willing<br />

will be identical with wh<strong>at</strong> my neighbour is willing, when<br />

he too wills the communal interest. While, therefore, my<br />

will, and th<strong>at</strong> of my neighbour will be apt to diverge in so<br />

far as we are concerned with our own particular sectional<br />

interests, they will coincide when he and I will the<br />

common interest.<br />

(5) On a committee or other public body opposed sectional<br />

interests are liable to cancel out. Thus, if X wants A and<br />

Y wants B, and the number of those who support X is<br />

equal to the number who support Y, neither A nor B<br />

1<br />

will be decided upon. Even if there is a majority in favour<br />

"of X, the existence of opposition may lead to concessions<br />

being made to the opposing minority. It is not, therefore,<br />

X in its original integrity which is decided upon, but X<br />

shorn of certain controversial fe<strong>at</strong>ures, or X diluted with<br />

elements derived from Y. This is the most usual result<br />

reached on a committee where interests are opposed, and<br />

is called compromise. When, however, everybody is willing<br />

the same thing, the necessity for compromise does not<br />

arise. There is, therefore, a tendency for wh<strong>at</strong> Rousseau<br />

would call the General Will to find expression on a committee,<br />

just because it is the one will which everybody may<br />

be supposed to have in common. Thus where sectional<br />

wills cancel out, the General Will may prevail.<br />

It is, however, <strong>at</strong> least as likely th<strong>at</strong> the course of action<br />

which the committee decides to adopt will represent a<br />

mechanical resultant, in the sense of resultant defined<br />

above, 1 of the conflicting sectional wills of all its members.<br />

If this happens, the committee's action will represent nobody's<br />

will. This result is the one most commonly reached<br />

1 Sec p. 509.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!