04.02.2013 Views

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

GUIDE TO THE PHILOSOPHY 1938 - 1947.pdf - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

366<br />

'<br />

ETHICS<br />

he affirms, only in isol<strong>at</strong>ed cases. Confronted by the difficulty<br />

of such cases, We find ourselves tempted to break the<br />

rules, to mitig<strong>at</strong>e the rigour of justice, and to make an<br />

exception in our applic<strong>at</strong>ion of the law. When assailed<br />

by this tempt<strong>at</strong>ion, we have, however, to ask ourselves the<br />

question, wh<strong>at</strong> would happen if our conduct in deciding to<br />

tre<strong>at</strong> the case under consider<strong>at</strong>ion as an exception were to<br />

become general. Clearly, rules would be widely broken,<br />

justice would no longer be administered, and the law would<br />

fell into contempt. If these things were to occur, society<br />

would become impossible. The breakdown of society<br />

would be destructive of the general happiness, which is<br />

largely dependent upon the maintenance of security and<br />

order which society alone can guarantee.<br />

The conclusion is th<strong>at</strong> the utility of rules vanishes, if<br />

we are prepared to make exceptions. It is more desirable<br />

th<strong>at</strong> we should maintain the rules, however hardly they<br />

may bear upon particular cases, than th<strong>at</strong> we should<br />

suspend rules in order to avoid inflicting hardship in<br />

particular cases.<br />

This is Kant's test of universaliz<strong>at</strong>ion 1 in another form.<br />

There is no contradiction in having rules which everybody<br />

keeps; there is contradiction in making an exception<br />

whenever the rules bear hardly, because if the exceptions<br />

become sufficiently numerous and there is nothing to<br />

prevent them from doing so, once they are admitted<br />

the rules will no longer command respect, and will cease<br />

to be rules. Hume's conclusion is th<strong>at</strong> our willingness in<br />

particular cases to take action in the interests of law and<br />

justice, which is inimical to the happiness of certain<br />

persons, does not invalid<strong>at</strong>e the general principle th<strong>at</strong> in<br />

the long run happiness is the only thing for which men feel<br />

approval! For men, being r<strong>at</strong>ional beings, are able to take<br />

into account not only the immedi<strong>at</strong>e, but the remote<br />

consequences of their actions, and these, if they are to be<br />

such as we can approve, must entail respect for rules and<br />

a willingness to obey the laws, since without such respect<br />

1 See Chapter VI, p. ao8.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!